10. A buyer has written an offer for a commercial building for $5.2 million. Another buyer writes an offer on the same building for $5.4 million later the same day. The second offer is presented before the seller makes a decision on the first offer. Which of the following is true in this situation?

Answer: B

Explanation:

The seller can accept either offer

In this situation, the seller has the discretion to choose which offer to accept. Since both offers are valid and the second offer was presented before a decision was made on the first, the seller can evaluate and select either one.

A) The seller must accept the highest offer.

This option is incorrect because there is no legal obligation for the seller to accept the highest offer. Sellers have the right to consider various factors beyond just the offer amount, including terms and conditions, buyer qualifications, and personal preferences.

B) The seller can accept either offer

This option is correct as it accurately reflects the seller's authority in this situation. The seller is not bound to reject the first offer simply because a higher offer has come in; they can choose either offer based on their evaluation and strategy.

C) or reject both offers.

While it is true that the seller could reject both offers, this option does not capture the primary focus of the question, which is about the seller's ability to choose between the two offers. Therefore, it is not as relevant or accurate in this context.

D) The seller must take action on the first offer before considering the second one.

This option is incorrect because the seller is not required to take action on the first offer before reviewing the second. The timing of the offers allows the seller to consider both simultaneously, offering flexibility in decision-making.

Conclusion

The correct answer highlights the seller's authority to choose between the two offers without any obligation to accept the highest one. While the seller could reject both offers or take action on the first, the key point is that they have the freedom to accept either offer based on their criteria and judgment. This flexibility is crucial in real estate transactions.