36. A particular apartment building has changed ownership three × in 10 years, and the price has increased each time a minimum of 23%. Price increases for similar apartment buildings have averaged 17% per sale in that time. Is a licensee in Illinois justified in guaranteeing a prospective buyer of this apartment building at least an 8% profit on the resale of the property

Answer: C

Explanation:

No, because the licensee should never guarantee a future profit of any amount

A licensee in Illinois is not justified in guaranteeing a prospective buyer any profit on the resale of the property, as such guarantees can be misleading and are typically not supported by market conditions or legal standards.

A) Yes, because this apartment building has a proven profitability history

While the apartment building has experienced price increases in ownership changes, past performance does not guarantee future results. The profitability history alone does not validate a guarantee of profit, as market conditions can fluctuate significantly.

B) Yes, because the average price increase for similar apartment buildings is more than twice the target amount

Although the average price increase for similar buildings is higher than the target profit, it does not justify a guarantee of a specific profit amount. Market dynamics are complex, and relying solely on averages can be misleading in predicting individual property performance.

C) No, because the licensee should never guarantee a future profit of any amount

This option accurately reflects the ethical and legal stance regarding real estate transactions. Licensees are prohibited from guaranteeing future profits to protect buyers from potential losses and to maintain the integrity of the real estate market.

D) No, because past sales figures cannot reliably predict future prices

While past sales figures can provide some insight, they do not guarantee future market behavior. This option addresses a valid concern, but it fails to emphasize the critical point that guarantees themselves are inappropriate, regardless of past performance.

Conclusion

The correct answer highlights the principle that real estate professionals should not guarantee profits, as it can mislead buyers and violate ethical standards. While the apartment's price history and market averages are relevant, they do not provide sufficient grounds for a profit guarantee. All other options either misinterpret the implications of past performance or fail to address the ethical considerations involved.