Question 16

A restraint should be used only with physician order.

Restraints are medical interventions that should only be implemented under the guidance and order of a physician. This ensures that their use is justified, appropriate, and monitored for the safety and well-being of the patient.

A) for safety

While safety is a critical consideration in the use of restraints, it is not sufficient on its own to justify their application. Restraints should only be used when specifically ordered by a physician, as they can have significant implications for patient rights and autonomy.

B) to control hitting

Using restraints to control aggressive behavior, such as hitting, may seem justifiable in certain situations; however, this does not align with best practices. Restraints should not be used as a primary means of behavior management without a physician's order, as alternative strategies should be explored first.

C) with physician order

This option is correct as the use of restraints must be sanctioned by a physician's order. Regulatory standards dictate that restraints are only to be implemented when deemed medically necessary and under appropriate medical supervision to ensure patient safety and ethical care.

D) to prevent falls

Preventing falls is an important aspect of patient care, but using restraints for this purpose is not an acceptable practice unless specifically ordered by a physician. Alternatives to restraints should be considered to mitigate fall risks while respecting patient freedoms.

Conclusion

The requirement for a physician's order before using restraints is paramount to ensure ethical and safe care practices. Other options fail to consider the necessary medical oversight and potential risks associated with restraint use, reinforcing why option C is the only appropriate choice in this context.