11. A seller is offering his property for sale in as-is condition. A buyer enters into a contract with the seller and has the home inspected. The inspection reveals a latent defect known to, but not disclosed by, the seller. The buyer

Answer: A

Explanation:

The buyer can void the contract due to the seller's failure to disclose the latent defect.

In this situation, the buyer has the right to void the contract because the seller failed to disclose a latent defect that was known to him. This lack of disclosure is a significant violation of the seller's duty to inform the buyer of any property issues.

A) can void the contract due to the seller's failure to disclose the latent defect.

This option is correct because, under real estate law, sellers are required to disclose known defects, especially latent ones that are not easily observable. Since the seller was aware of the defect yet did not inform the buyer, the buyer is justified in voiding the contract.

B) can reduce the contract sales price by the cost of correcting the defect.

This option is incorrect because the buyer cannot simply reduce the sales price after discovering the defect if the seller did not disclose it. The buyer has the right to void the contract altogether rather than negotiate a lower price, as the seller's nondisclosure is a breach of obligation.

C) must go through with the purchase because the house is being sold as is.

This option is incorrect. While "as-is" sales imply that the buyer accepts the property in its current condition, it does not absolve the seller from the responsibility to disclose known defects. The buyer is not obligated to proceed with the purchase in the face of undisclosed latent defects.

D) can force the seller to correct the defect.

This option is also incorrect. The buyer cannot compel the seller to make repairs after entering into an "as-is" contract, especially when the seller has failed to disclose known issues. The buyer's recourse is to void the contract rather than seek repairs.

Conclusion

The correct answer is option A because the seller's nondisclosure of a known latent defect constitutes a breach of duty that allows the buyer to void the contract. All other options fail to recognize the buyer's legal rights in the context of undisclosed defects, emphasizing the importance of seller disclosure in real estate transactions.