36. A teacher wants students to feel more engaged during a science lab. Which strategy is most likely to promote intrinsic motivation?
Answer: D
Letting students test a question they develop with help
Allowing students to test a question they develop with assistance fosters intrinsic motivation by giving them ownership of their learning process. This strategy encourages curiosity and engagement as students explore their interests and ideas in a hands-on manner.
A) Grading students on the accuracy of their results
Grading students on accuracy may provide extrinsic motivation, but it can also lead to anxiety and a focus on performance rather than learning. This approach might deter students from engaging deeply with the material, as they may prioritize grades over genuine interest in the subject.
B) Awarding points for following directions
Awarding points for following directions promotes compliance and may encourage students to focus on procedural adherence rather than understanding the scientific concepts at play. This strategy does not enhance intrinsic motivation, as it does not allow for creative exploration or personal investment in the learning process.
C) Having students complete a predesigned lab template
Using a predesigned lab template restricts student autonomy and creativity, which can diminish intrinsic motivation. While it provides structure, it does not empower students to explore their own questions or interests, thus limiting engagement in the lab experience.
D) Letting students test a question they develop with help
This strategy promotes intrinsic motivation as it encourages students to take initiative and explore their curiosities. By developing their own questions, students are more likely to feel invested in the learning process and engage more deeply with the scientific inquiry.
Conclusion
Letting students test a question they develop with help is the most effective strategy for promoting intrinsic motivation in a science lab. It empowers students to take charge of their learning, fostering a sense of ownership and engagement that is not achieved through grading or structured templates. The other options fail to cultivate a deeper connection to the material, emphasizing compliance rather than genuine interest in science.