29. An offer was presented but the seller did not accept the offer; instead the seller suggested different terms that would be more acceptable. Which of the following is FALSE?
Answer: C
This is a negotiation that keeps the original offer alive.
The statement that this is a negotiation that keeps the original offer alive is false. When the seller proposes different terms, it effectively ends the original offer and initiates a new proposition, rather than keeping the original offer open.
A) This is a rejection of the original offer.
This statement is true because when the seller suggests different terms, it constitutes a rejection of the original offer. An acceptance would have required agreement to the terms as presented, which did not occur in this scenario.
B) This is a counter offer on the original offer.
This statement is also true. By suggesting different terms, the seller is making a counter offer, which is a new offer that alters the terms of the original offer. This action explicitly indicates that the seller does not accept the original terms.
C) This is a negotiation that keeps the original offer alive.
This statement is false. A counter offer, by its nature, invalidates the original offer since it introduces new terms for consideration. Therefore, the original offer is no longer available for acceptance once a counter offer is made.
D) This kills the original offer, which can no longer be accepted.
This statement is true. A counter offer concludes the original offer, meaning it cannot be accepted thereafter. The original offer is extinguished, and the parties must now consider the new terms proposed by the seller.
Conclusion
The correct answer is C, as it inaccurately describes the nature of the interaction between the buyer and seller. The original offer is rejected and replaced by a counter offer, which means it is no longer alive. Thus, options A, B, and D correctly reflect the legal implications of the seller's actions, while C fails to do so.