Question 16

Continuous auditing

Implementing continuous auditing allows the organization to track how often a file is accessed and identify the users accessing it. This solution provides a comprehensive view of user interactions with the file, ensuring that access can be monitored consistently over time.

A) Continuous auditing

Continuous auditing is specifically designed for monitoring access to files, making it the optimal choice for tracking user interactions. It enables the organization to maintain real-time insights into file access patterns and user behavior, thereby enhancing security and compliance.

B) Persistent protection

Persistent protection focuses on securing files and ensuring that they remain protected regardless of where they are stored or shared. While it enhances file security, it does not specifically track access frequency or user identity, making it less suitable for the organization's need to monitor file access.

C) Dynamic policy control

Dynamic policy control allows organizations to adjust permissions and access rights dynamically based on various factors. However, it does not inherently provide the tracking capabilities required to monitor how often a file is accessed or by which users, thus failing to meet the organization's specific tracking needs.

D) Automatic expiration

Automatic expiration refers to the ability to set time limits on file access rights or permissions. Although it can help manage file access duration, it does not track access frequency or user identities, which are crucial for the organization's requirements.

Conclusion

Continuous auditing is the definitive solution for the organization's need to track file access and user interactions. In contrast, the other options—persistent protection, dynamic policy control, and automatic expiration—fail to provide the necessary monitoring capabilities, thus underscoring why continuous auditing is the best choice.