91. An owner gives a property manager instructions that could result in hardship or loss to the owner. The property manager should
Answer: D
The property manager should inform the principal of possible harm.
In situations where instructions from an owner could lead to hardship or loss, the property manager is ethically and professionally obligated to inform the principal about the potential risks involved.
A) simply ignore the instructions.
Ignoring the owner's instructions is not a viable option as it undermines the property manager's professional responsibility. However, it neglects the duty to communicate and may lead to further complications or legal issues, as the property manager should always act in the best interest of the owner while ensuring they are fully informed.
B) follow the instructions without question.
Following the owner's instructions without question can lead to significant negative consequences for the owner, including potential financial loss or legal issues. It is critical for the property manager to assess the implications of these instructions and communicate any possible harm instead of blindly adhering to them.
C) automatically terminate employment.
Automatically terminating employment is an extreme response and does not address the core issue at hand. This option fails to recognize the importance of communication and the opportunity for the property manager to discuss the potential consequences with the owner before resorting to such drastic measures.
D) inform the principal of possible harm.
Informing the principal of possible harm is the most responsible course of action. This ensures that the owner is aware of the risks associated with their instructions and allows for informed decision-making, ultimately protecting the owner's interests and minimizing potential losses.
Conclusion
The correct answer is D because it emphasizes the importance of communication and responsibility in property management. By informing the principal of possible harm, the property manager acts in the best interest of the owner, whereas all other options either neglect this duty or propose inappropriate responses to the situation.