Question 35

The author would disagree with the Necessary and Proper Clause.

The passage emphasizes the limits of governmental powers and suggests a caution against overreach, indicating that the author would likely disagree with the broad interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause, which allows for expansive governmental authority.

A) Necessary and Proper Clause

This clause grants Congress the power to create laws deemed necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers. The author’s assertion that governmental powers should be restrained within proper limits implies a disagreement with any interpretation that would allow for an expansive application of authority under this clause.

B) Full Faith and Credit Clause

This clause requires states to respect the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of other states. The author does not address inter-state relations or the obligations of states toward each other, making this option irrelevant to the core argument presented in the extract.

C) Impeachment Clause

The Impeachment Clause outlines the process for removing a president or other federal officials. While this clause pertains to checks on power, it does not relate directly to the author’s concern about the breadth of governmental authority as discussed in the passage.

D) Commerce Clause

The Commerce Clause allows Congress to regulate commerce among the states. Although this clause can lead to expansive interpretations, the passage does not specifically challenge it. The author’s focus is more on the overall limits of government, rather than targeting specific clauses like the Commerce Clause.

Conclusion

The author fundamentally advocates for a restrained approach to governmental powers, making the Necessary and Proper Clause the focal point of disagreement. In contrast, the other options do not directly pertain to the author’s concerns about overreach or limitations on governmental authority, thus reinforcing that A is the only choice that aligns with the passage's message.