13. If there is a conflict between a policy provision and state statutes the policy

Answer: B

Explanation:

The policy must meet minimum statute requirements.

In cases where there is a conflict between a policy provision and state statutes, the policy is required to adhere to the minimum requirements established by the statutes. This ensures that the policy remains compliant with legal standards and protects the rights of all parties involved.

A) must be reviewed by the insurance commissioner

While insurance policies may be subject to review by the insurance commissioner for compliance, this option does not directly address the specific requirement in the event of a conflict with state statutes. Therefore, it is incorrect as it does not capture the essence of how policies must align with state laws.

B) must meet minimum statute requirements

This option accurately reflects the necessity for the policy to comply with the minimum requirements set forth by state statutes when there is a conflict. This ensures that the policy is legally enforceable and adheres to state regulations, making it the correct answer.

C) can be submitted as written

This option implies that the policy can remain unchanged despite conflicts with state statutes, which is incorrect. Policies must be adjusted to comply with legal requirements, making this option invalid in the context of the question.

D) supersedes state statutes

This statement is incorrect because no policy can legally supersede state statutes. Policies must conform to the law, emphasizing the importance of compliance with statutory requirements over any individual policy provisions.

Conclusion

The necessity for policies to meet minimum statute requirements in the event of a conflict is crucial for legal compliance and protection of rights. Options A, C, and D fail to address this fundamental principle, making B the definitive correct choice as it aligns with statutory obligations.