Question 78

Readers can infer that the authors each supported a different team in the game described.

The comparison of the two accounts reveals that the authors demonstrate distinct perspectives, suggesting they each had allegiance to different teams involved in the game.

A) the authors share a common point of view

This option is incorrect because the contrasting viewpoints in the accounts indicate a divergence rather than a shared perspective. The differences in opinions highlight their individual biases related to the teams they support.

B) the authors are likely sports journalists for the same newspaper

This choice is unlikely as the differing perspectives on the game imply that they may represent different outlets or have varying affiliations. Sharing a common platform would typically lead to more aligned viewpoints.

C) the authors each supported a different team in the game described

This option is correct as the accounts reflect differing biases and interpretations of the game, which strongly suggests that each author supported a different team. Their distinct narratives align with the idea of rival fanbases.

D) the authors recognized that the referees of the game favored the Hawks

While this option could be a point of contention, the accounts do not necessarily indicate that both authors agreed on the referees' favoritism. Instead, their differences suggest they might interpret the refereeing in a way that aligns with their respective team loyalties.

Conclusion

The correct answer is option C, as it accurately reflects the authors' differing loyalties and perspectives regarding the game. Other options fail to capture the essence of the contrasting viewpoints presented, emphasizing that the authors likely support rival teams rather than sharing a common viewpoint or affiliation.