1. In paragraph 10, Brannick's claims it will minimize noise and traffic that result from the new superstore. Is this claim well supported?
Answer: A
No, because Brannick's provides limited details concerning the plan for controlling congestion.
Brannick's claim to minimize noise and traffic resulting from the new superstore is not well supported, as they fail to provide specific details on how they plan to achieve this goal. The lack of concrete information regarding traffic management measures leaves their assertions unsubstantiated.
A) No, because Brannick's provides limited details concerning the plan for controlling congestion.
This option is correct because Brannick's does not elaborate on the specific strategies or measures they will implement to control potential traffic congestion and noise levels. Without clear plans or actionable steps, their assurances lack credibility.
B) Yes, because Brannick's recognizes how complex the problems associated with large superstores are.
This option is incorrect. While Brannick's acknowledges the complexities involved, mere recognition does not equate to providing a robust solution. They do not detail how they will address these complexities, which is critical for substantiating their claims.
C) No, because Brannick's is vague about the number of customers the store might draw from nearby towns.
This option is also incorrect. Although the potential customer base may be a relevant factor, the primary issue at hand is Brannick's failure to provide a comprehensive plan for noise and traffic management. The vagueness regarding customer numbers does not directly impact the efficacy of their mitigation claims.
D) Yes, because Brannick's explains how it has worked with the city government to resolve the problems.
This option is incorrect as well. While Brannick's mentions collaboration with the city government, they do not provide specific details on the outcomes of this cooperation or any actionable plans that would effectively mitigate noise and traffic concerns.
Conclusion
Brannick's assertion to minimize noise and traffic is not well supported due to a lack of detail regarding their plans for congestion control. All other options either misinterpret the claim's shortcomings or fail to address the critical need for specific, actionable strategies. Consequently, Option A is the only choice that accurately reflects the inadequacy of Brannick's assertions.