Question 45

No because link contains all

The social media post is not a violation because the provided link to the full MLS page contains all necessary information regarding the property. This includes essential details that would typically be required in a listing, such as the property address and broker affiliation.

A) yes missing property address

This option is incorrect because, although the social media post does not explicitly mention the property address, the link to the MLS page is assumed to contain this information. It is standard practice for MLS listings to provide comprehensive property details, including the address.

B) yes missing brokerage address

Option B is also incorrect as the link to the MLS page should include the brokerage information. The absence of this detail in the post itself does not constitute a violation if it is available on the linked page.

C) no because link contains all

This option is correct since the link provided in the post is expected to include all the necessary information, such as the property address and brokerage details. Therefore, the lack of these specifics in the social media post itself does not violate any regulations.

D) no because link has broker affiliation

While this option suggests that the presence of broker affiliation in the link could suffice, it overlooks the essentiality of having all relevant details available. Thus, it does not fully address the requirement for a property address and other necessary information which would be included in the linked MLS page.

Conclusion

The correct answer is C, as the link to the MLS page ensures that all required property details are accessible, thus eliminating any potential violation. Options A and B incorrectly assert that missing information in the post itself constitutes a violation, while D fails to acknowledge the importance of comprehensive details, making C the definitive choice.