46. The author supports the claim that satellites do not last forever through the use of which of the following?
Answer: C
A comparison of satellites to other common machines that stop working
The author supports the claim that satellites do not last forever by drawing a comparison between satellites and other common machines that also have a finite lifespan. This analogy helps illustrate the inherent limitations and eventual failure of satellites in a relatable way.
A) An anecdote about why satellites stop working when they do
This option is incorrect because the author does not provide a specific anecdote detailing the reasons satellites stop functioning. An anecdote would focus on a particular event or story rather than a broader comparison to machines.
B) Examples of the ways satellites stop working over time
While examples of how satellites fail could support the claim, the extract does not present specific instances or examples of satellite failures. Thus, this option does not align with the author's method of supporting the claim.
C) A comparison of satellites to other common machines that stop working
This option is correct because it emphasizes the author's use of comparison as a rhetorical device. By likening satellites to other machines, the author effectively conveys the concept that all mechanical entities, including satellites, ultimately face obsolescence or failure.
D) Suggestions for ways to keep satellites working over time
This option is incorrect as the author does not offer any suggestions or strategies for maintaining satellite functionality. Instead, the focus is on the inevitability of failure, which contradicts the idea of proposing solutions for longevity.
Conclusion
The correct answer, a comparison of satellites to other common machines that stop working, effectively highlights the finite nature of satellites through relatable analogies. Other options fail to provide the necessary support for the claim, as they either lack specific examples, anecdotes, or suggestions that align with the author's argument. This comparison reinforces the understanding that all machines, including satellites, are subject to wear and eventual failure.