26. The Multiple Listing Service (MLS) board members decided that the population of each area of the city would be best served by the brokerages who have offices actually located within those areas. The board established boundaries dividing the city into six districts and voted to limit listings for each district to only those brokerages with offices within the district. Brokerages who tried to advertise beyond their own district would be prohibited from listing properties in the MLS. This action violates what Real Estate Law?

Answer: C

Explanation:

The action violates the Sherman Anti-trust Act.

The decision by the MLS board to limit listings to only those brokerages with offices within their designated districts infringes upon competitive practices, which is a key concern of the Sherman Anti-trust Act. This law aims to prevent monopolistic behaviors and promote fair competition in the marketplace.

A) Civil Rights Act

The Civil Rights Act primarily addresses discrimination in housing based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. While the actions of the MLS board may indirectly affect equal access to housing opportunities, the core issue relates to market competition rather than civil rights violations.

B) Diversity Jurisdiction

Diversity jurisdiction refers to the ability of federal courts to hear cases involving parties from different states. This legal principle does not pertain to real estate practices or the regulation of brokerages, making it irrelevant in this context.

C) Sherman Anti-trust Act

This option is correct as the Sherman Anti-trust Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements and actions that restrain trade. By restricting listings to brokerages within specific districts, the MLS board's decision creates a barrier to entry for other brokerages, thereby violating this law.

D) Housing and Community Development Act of 1974

While this act addresses issues related to community development and housing assistance, it does not specifically address anti-competitive practices in real estate markets. Thus, it is not the central legal violation in this scenario.

Conclusion

The Sherman Anti-trust Act is the relevant law that has been violated by the MLS board's decision to limit property listings to brokerages within specific districts. This restriction undermines fair competition by preventing other brokerages from accessing the market, which is the fundamental principle protected by the Act. Other options either pertain to different legal concerns or do not directly address the competitive nature of real estate listings.