10. Under cluster zoning, the size of lots within a designated residential area and the required frontage can be reduced if the development abuts a declared wetland or national forest.
Answer: C
Overall density does not exceed the master plan
Reducing the size of lots and required frontage under cluster zoning is permissible as long as the overall density of the development does not exceed what is outlined in the master plan. This approach helps maintain the integrity of the area while allowing for flexibility in land use.
A) Development abuts a declared wetland or national forest
While this option indicates a specific condition that might influence zoning regulations, it does not directly relate to the density requirements stipulated in the master plan. The presence of wetlands or national forests may inform other considerations, but it does not inherently justify the reduction of lot size or frontage without regard to overall density.
B) Development abuts state-owned land
Similar to Option A, abutting state-owned land may affect zoning decisions, but it does not directly address the criteria for reducing lot sizes or frontages under cluster zoning. The specifics of density in relation to the master plan remain the critical factor for such adjustments.
C) Overall density does not exceed the master plan
This option correctly identifies the core principle that allows for the reduction of lot sizes and required frontage in cluster zoning. It emphasizes that any modifications must ensure that the overall density remains compliant with the established guidelines of the master plan, which is essential for sustainable development.
D) Plan includes commercial or industrial uses
While the inclusion of commercial or industrial uses may alter the dynamics of a development plan, it does not pertain directly to the conditions under which lot sizes and frontages can be reduced. This option fails to address the primary concern of density relative to the master plan.
Conclusion
The correct answer emphasizes the importance of adhering to the overall density limits set by the master plan, which is the foundational principle of cluster zoning. Options A, B, and D, while relevant to zoning considerations, do not address the essential requirement of density compliance, making them incorrect in this context. Thus, option C stands out as the definitive guideline for reducing lot sizes and required frontages in residential developments.