38. Under which of the following circumstances may a licensee be employed by more than one broker?

Answer: B

Explanation:

A licensee may be employed by more than one broker if they receive written approval from each employing broker.

A licensee can work for multiple brokers only if they obtain written consent from each broker involved. This ensures that all parties are aware of the arrangement and agree to the terms under which the licensee will operate.

A) The licensee works in a branch office managed by an associate broker.

This option is incorrect because merely working in a branch office managed by an associate broker does not grant the licensee the ability to be employed by multiple brokers. Employment status is dictated by agreements with brokers, not by the structure of the office.

B) The licensee receives written approval from each employing broker.

This option is correct as it explicitly states the requirement for a licensee to be employed by more than one broker. Written approval ensures that both brokers are aware of the licensee's engagements and agree to the terms, which is essential for compliance with licensing regulations.

C) The licensee sells properties in an area that is greater than 100 miles in radius.

This option is incorrect because the geographical area in which a licensee operates does not inherently allow for employment by multiple brokers. Employment conditions depend on formal agreements, not on distance.

D) Under no circumstances may a licensee have more than one employing broker.

This option is incorrect as it contradicts the possibility of multiple employments under specific conditions. It overlooks the provision for written approval, which can allow such arrangements.

Conclusion

The correct answer, B, highlights the necessity of written approval from each broker, which is a critical requirement for a licensee wishing to operate under multiple brokers. All other options either misinterpret the conditions under which a licensee can work or outright deny the possibility of dual employment, failing to recognize the importance of mutual agreement in such scenarios.