Question 6

Readers do not associate the Department of Energy with algae research.

The author assumes that readers may not automatically connect the Department of Energy's funding with research on algae, indicating a potential gap in public perception regarding the agency's involvement in this area of science.

A) Gases produced by algae will be cheaper to produce than other gases.

This option is incorrect because the passage does not discuss the cost-effectiveness of hydrogen production from algae compared to other gases. The focus is on the potential energy applications of hydrogen produced by algae, without mentioning any economic evaluations.

B) The Department of Energy is already using hydrogen-producing algae as a source of energy.

This choice is incorrect as the passage states that the research is ongoing and implies potential future applications, but does not indicate that the Department of Energy is currently using hydrogen-producing algae for energy. The assumption does not reflect the current state of research or application.

C) Mutant versions of algae will not be capable of the process of photosynthesis.

This option is incorrect since the passage specifically mentions that the mutant versions of algae are designed to produce more hydrogen during photosynthesis. Therefore, the assumption that they will not be capable of photosynthesis contradicts the information provided in the passage.

D) Readers do not associate the Department of Energy with algae research.

This is the correct answer, as the passage suggests that the funding by the Department of Energy for algae research may not be a common association among readers. This highlights a gap in understanding regarding the agency's role in innovative energy research.

Conclusion

The assumption that readers do not associate the Department of Energy with algae research is supported by the context of the passage, which emphasizes the novelty of funding such research. Other options either misinterpret the passage or introduce ideas not present in the text, thus failing to align with the author’s implied belief about public perception.