16. What is one of the three primary strategies that nonfinancial companies use to cope with currency risks?
Answer: C
Strategic hedging is one of the primary strategies that nonfinancial companies use to cope with currency risks.
Strategic hedging enables companies to mitigate potential losses arising from currency fluctuations by employing financial instruments or market strategies to offset risks associated with exchange rate movements.
A) Keeping low inventories
While maintaining low inventories can be a strategy for managing operational risks, it does not directly address currency risk exposure. This approach primarily focuses on reducing holding costs rather than mitigating the financial impacts of currency fluctuations.
B) Reducing currency liabilities
Reducing currency liabilities may seem like a relevant strategy; however, it does not encompass the comprehensive approach of managing currency risk. This option focuses on minimizing debt in foreign currencies but lacks the proactive measures that strategic hedging incorporates.
C) Strategic hedging
Strategic hedging is a proactive approach where companies use financial instruments, such as options and futures, to protect against adverse currency movements. This strategy effectively allows companies to stabilize their financial outcomes despite fluctuations in exchange rates, making it a key method for managing currency risk.
D) Using foreign dealers for their goods
Utilizing foreign dealers can expose a company to additional currency risks, as transactions may be subject to exchange rate fluctuations. This strategy does not inherently provide protection against currency risks and can instead complicate financial management.
Conclusion
Strategic hedging stands out as the definitive answer because it directly addresses the need for nonfinancial companies to protect themselves against currency fluctuations using financial instruments. In contrast, the other options either do not specifically manage currency risk or may even increase exposure to it, demonstrating their inadequacy in comparison to the comprehensive protection provided by strategic hedging.