Question 4

Paragraph 8 contrasts information in paragraph 7.

Paragraph 8 serves to highlight opposing viewpoints to the majority ruling discussed in paragraph 7. While paragraph 7 describes the Supreme Court's decision regarding the statute of limitations on filing a complaint, paragraph 8 introduces Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's dissenting opinion, which directly contrasts with the majority's interpretation of Title VII.

A) Paragraph 8 presents a solution to a problem raised in paragraph 7.

This option is incorrect because paragraph 8 does not offer a solution to the issues outlined in paragraph 7 regarding the limitations of filing a complaint. Instead, it presents a dissenting opinion that highlights a disagreement with the majority ruling rather than a solution.

B) Paragraph 8 contrasts information in paragraph 7.

This option is correct because paragraph 8 provides a contrasting perspective to the ruling mentioned in paragraph 7. It showcases dissent from Justice Ginsburg, emphasizing that the majority's interpretation is too narrow and incompatible with the broader intent of Title VII, thereby contrasting the two viewpoints.

C) Paragraph 8 applies a concept presented in paragraph 7.

This choice is incorrect as paragraph 8 does not apply any concepts from paragraph 7; rather, it presents a critique of the ruling discussed in paragraph 7. The dissent does not follow the same line of reasoning but rather challenges it.

D) Paragraph 8 provides evidence for an issue presented in paragraph 7.

This option is incorrect because paragraph 8 does not provide evidence supporting the claims made in paragraph 7. Instead, it offers a dissenting opinion that opposes the majority's reasoning and conclusions, thus not serving as evidence but rather as a counterpoint.

Conclusion

In summary, the relationship between paragraphs 7 and 8 is one of contrast, with paragraph 8 providing a dissenting view that opposes the majority ruling discussed in paragraph 7. The correct answer is B, as it accurately reflects the nature of the discourse between the two paragraphs, highlighting differing interpretations of Title VII and its implications. All other options fail to capture this contrasting relationship effectively.