84. What should be the frequency of sanctions screening for a customer once they have been onboarded by a financial institution?

Answer: C

Explanation:

Screening should be conducted only at onboarding and during periodic KYC reviews.

Sanctions screening for a customer once onboarded by a financial institution should occur only at the time of onboarding and during periodic Know Your Customer (KYC) reviews. This approach ensures that the institution remains compliant with regulations while managing resources effectively.

A) Daily screening to catch any changes in sanctions lists

Daily screening may seem advantageous for real-time compliance; however, it is impractical for most institutions due to resource constraints. Constantly monitoring sanctions lists every day could lead to unnecessary operational burdens without significantly enhancing the effectiveness of risk management.

B) Weekly screening to balance compliance with operational efficiency

While weekly screenings might provide a compromise between compliance and efficiency, they still do not align with the established practice of conducting screenings primarily at onboarding and during periodic KYC reviews. This option could lead to inefficiencies and increased costs without offering proportional benefits in risk mitigation.

C) Screening only at onboarding and during periodic KYC reviews

This option reflects the standard practice within financial institutions and adheres to regulatory guidelines. Conducting screenings at these key points ensures that the institution is compliant with sanctions regulations without incurring the excessive costs associated with more frequent screenings.

D) Screening only when there is a material change in the customer's risk profile

Screening solely based on material changes in a customer's risk profile could expose the institution to potential risks if such changes occur unexpectedly. It does not provide a comprehensive approach to sanctions compliance, as it overlooks the necessity of initial and periodic checks that capture changes in sanctions lists.

Conclusion

The correct answer emphasizes the importance of strategic screening at onboarding and during periodic reviews, which effectively balances compliance and operational efficiency. Other options fail to recognize the necessity of maintaining a structured approach to sanctions compliance, either by imposing excessive screening frequency or by neglecting key intervals for monitoring.