Question 20

Requiring all IT specialist applicants age 50 and above to complete a computer knowledge test

This example demonstrates disparate treatment because it imposes a specific requirement solely based on age, which can unfairly disadvantage older applicants compared to their younger counterparts.

A) Requiring all applicants interested in a position in editing to submit a writing sample of at least 10 pages

This practice applies uniformly to all applicants regardless of their background or characteristics, thus not reflecting disparate treatment. It sets a standard for all candidates based on job-related criteria.

B) Requiring all accounting applicants to possess an accounting degree

Similar to option A, this requirement applies equally to all candidates seeking an accounting position. It is a legitimate qualification standard that does not discriminate against any group based on personal characteristics.

C) Requiring all IT specialist applicants age 50 and above to complete a computer knowledge test

This option exemplifies disparate treatment as it targets a specific age group, creating a barrier that does not apply to younger applicants. Such a requirement can lead to discrimination against older candidates, which is a clear violation of equal employment practices.

D) Requiring all firefighter applicants to pass a physical abilities test

This requirement is applicable to all candidates and is based on the essential physical demands of the job. It does not discriminate against any particular group, thereby not representing disparate treatment.

Conclusion

The choice of requiring all IT specialist applicants age 50 and above to complete a computer knowledge test clearly illustrates disparate treatment since it unfairly singles out older applicants for a requirement that does not apply to others. In contrast, the other options present standard practices that do not discriminate based on age or any other protected characteristic, thereby aligning with equal employment principles.