Question 43

Parker wanted his men to wait to see whether the British would act first.

Captain John Parker's order clearly indicates that his soldiers should not initiate combat but should be prepared to respond if the British fired upon them. This reflects a strategic approach to gauge the British intentions before escalating the conflict.

A) Parker wanted his men to be the ones to begin the battle against the British.

This option misinterprets Parker's directive. He explicitly instructed his men not to fire unless provoked, indicating a desire to avoid unnecessary conflict and not to initiate the battle.

B) Parker wanted his men to surrender to the British in hope of peace.

This choice fails to align with the context of Parker's order. He was preparing his men for potential conflict rather than advocating for surrender or seeking peace, as evidenced by his statement that if war was to come, it should begin at their location.

C) Parker wanted his men to wait to see whether the British would act first.

This option accurately captures the essence of Parker's statement. By instructing his men not to fire unless fired upon, he was indeed advocating for a cautious approach to determine the British's intentions before engaging in battle.

D) Parker wanted his men to hide the weapons for a surprise attack on the British.

This option is incorrect because it suggests a tactic of deception and surprise that contradicts Parker's instruction to not attack unless provoked. His order emphasizes readiness without initiating hostilities, not hiding or concealing their weapons.

Conclusion

The correct answer, C, encapsulates Parker's intent to have his men remain vigilant while refraining from initiating combat, thus allowing them to respond appropriately if they were attacked. All other options misinterpret his directive, either by suggesting an aggressive stance or advocating for surrender, which does not reflect the historical context of his command.