Question 74

National security is an exception to full and open competition.

National security is a recognized exception to the requirement for full and open competition, allowing agencies to bypass standard procurement procedures when issues of national defense or security are at stake.

A) National security

This option is correct because national security is explicitly noted as an exception in procurement regulations. When the protection of national interests is involved, agencies may limit competition to ensure that sensitive information or technologies do not fall into the wrong hands.

B) Only two responsible sources will satisfy agency requirements

This option is incorrect as it does not represent an exception to full and open competition. While it may justify a limited competition scenario, agencies are still required to seek competition whenever feasible, even if only two sources are available.

C) Urgency due to expiring funds

This option is also incorrect. Although urgency can lead to a justification for limited competition, it is not considered a formal exception to full and open competition. Agencies must still strive to ensure that competition is maximized even in urgent situations.

D) Award of a follow-on contract

This option is incorrect as well. The award of a follow-on contract does not inherently qualify as an exception to full and open competition. Agencies must still follow competitive practices unless specific criteria that justify limited competition are met.

Conclusion

In summary, national security is the only option provided that is a legitimate exception to full and open competition, as it directly pertains to the safeguarding of national interests. The other options, while they may provide justifications for limited competition, do not meet the criteria to be considered exceptions under procurement regulations.