35. Which of the following is generally permissible under the federal Fair Housing Act and its Amendments?
Answer: A
Renting rooms to only adult men in an owner-occupied four-unit building is generally permissible under the federal Fair Housing Act and its Amendments.
This practice is permissible because the Fair Housing Act provides exemptions for certain owner-occupied buildings with a limited number of units, allowing owners to limit occupancy based on sex.
A) renting rooms to only adult men in an owner-occupied four-unit building
This option is correct because the Fair Housing Act allows for certain exemptions in owner-occupied buildings with four or fewer units. In such cases, the owner can choose to rent to individuals of a specific gender, thus making this practice permissible.
B) refusing to rent a luxury apartment to a woman with custody of her grandson
This option is incorrect as it violates the Fair Housing Act, which prohibits discrimination based on familial status. Refusing to rent to a woman based on her status as a caretaker for her grandson constitutes discrimination against families with children.
C) advertising a condo online as being in a good Middle Eastern neighborhood
This option is generally incorrect because it could be seen as discriminatory or perpetuating stereotypes about race or ethnicity. The Fair Housing Act prohibits advertising that indicates a preference or limitation based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
D) requiring persons with disabilities to pay higher than usual security deposits
This option is also incorrect, as it violates the Fair Housing Act. The law mandates that individuals with disabilities must not face additional financial burdens, such as higher security deposits, solely based on their disability status.
Conclusion
The permissible nature of renting rooms to only adult men in an owner-occupied four-unit building highlights the specific exemptions outlined in the Fair Housing Act, which allow for some flexibility in housing practices under certain conditions. In contrast, all other options presented reflect discriminatory practices that violate the Act's intent to ensure fair housing for all individuals regardless of sex, familial status, or disability.