30. Which of the following pieces of evidence from the text supports the conclusion that Viele's work had an impact on the development of Manhattan island?
Answer: A
Builders analyze potential sites for stability, impacting building type and zoning options.
The reliance on Viele's map by engineers for assessing soil conditions and underground water illustrates its significant impact on the development of Manhattan. Builders must analyze potential sites for stability, which directly influences the types of buildings that can be constructed and the zoning regulations that govern those developments.
A) Builders must analyze potential sites for stability, which affects the building type and zoning options.
This option correctly highlights the practical application of Viele's map in assessing potential building sites. By understanding the original marshes and waterways, builders can make informed decisions that ensure structural integrity and compliance with zoning laws, thus demonstrating the map's lasting influence on Manhattan's development.
B) Central Park continues to flood, which Viele set out to prevent with his map.
While this statement refers to an issue related to Viele's work, it does not directly support the conclusion regarding the development of Manhattan. The flooding of Central Park indicates a failure or limitation of the planning efforts rather than an impact on the broader construction practices in Manhattan.
C) Central Park continues to flood, which Viele set out to prevent with his map.
This option is identical to Option B and suffers from the same reasoning. It does not address the broader implications of Viele's work on building practices across Manhattan and therefore does not support the conclusion regarding its impact on development.
D) Residents of Manhattan Island find it easy to grow gardens due to the well-established water map.
This option inaccurately suggests a direct benefit for residents that is not substantiated by the extract. While the map aids in understanding water flow, it does not specifically indicate that it facilitates gardening, making this choice irrelevant to the context of development on Manhattan Island.
Conclusion
Option A is the only choice that directly correlates with the enduring influence of Viele's map on construction practices and urban planning in Manhattan. The other options either misrepresent the impact of the map or fail to connect it to the broader context of development, reinforcing the necessity of site analysis in ensuring the stability and appropriateness of building projects.