6. Which of the following would be the best solution to deploy a low-cost standby site that includes hardware and internet access?
Answer: B
A cold site would be the best solution for a low-cost standby site that includes hardware and internet access.
A cold site is a backup facility that provides basic infrastructure such as power, cooling, and internet connectivity, but does not include active hardware or data. This makes it a cost-effective option for organizations that can afford to wait for a recovery process to set up the necessary equipment and restore data.
A) Recovery site
A recovery site typically refers to a location that has the necessary infrastructure and systems already in place to resume operations quickly after a disaster. This option is generally more expensive than a cold site because it requires a full setup of hardware and software, making it unsuitable for low-cost solutions.
B) Cold site
A cold site is designed for situations where a lower-cost option is acceptable. It provides the essential facilities, such as internet access and space for hardware installation, but does not come with pre-installed systems or active data. This makes it ideal for organizations seeking to minimize costs while still having a backup plan.
C) Hot site
A hot site is a fully operational backup facility that mirrors the primary site and allows for immediate failover. This option is the most expensive due to its requirement for duplicate hardware, software, and continuous data synchronization, making it impractical for a low-cost standby solution.
D) Warm site
A warm site is a hybrid option that includes some hardware and is partially configured to be operational. While it is cheaper than a hot site, it still incurs higher costs than a cold site due to the presence of pre-installed systems and partial data backups, making it less suited for organizations strictly aiming for low-cost solutions.
Conclusion
In summary, a cold site is the most appropriate choice for a low-cost standby solution as it offers basic infrastructure without the expenses associated with higher-tier options like hot or warm sites. All other options present higher costs or require more immediate operational capabilities, which do not align with the goal of minimizing expenditures.