62. Which one of the following is legally entitled to sue a seller for a commission when the buyer was represented by a subagent?
Answer: B
Listing broker is legally entitled to sue a seller for a commission when the buyer was represented by a subagent.
In this scenario, the listing broker has the legal right to pursue a commission from the seller despite the buyer being represented by a subagent. This entitlement arises from the contractual agreement between the seller and the listing broker.
A) Listing salesperson.
The listing salesperson, although involved in the transaction, does not have the legal standing to sue for the commission. Only the listing broker, who holds the contractual relationship with the seller, can pursue such claims.
B) Listing broker.
The listing broker is the correct answer because they are the party who entered into a contract with the seller and are entitled to receive a commission for their services, irrespective of the buyer's representation by a subagent.
C) Selling salesperson.
The selling salesperson represents the buyer and does not have a direct contractual relationship with the seller. Therefore, they lack the legal authority to sue the seller for a commission.
D) Selling broker.
Similar to the selling salesperson, the selling broker does not have a contractual agreement with the seller. Their role is to facilitate the transaction on behalf of the buyer, which does not grant them entitlement to sue the seller for commission.
Conclusion
The listing broker is the only party with the legal authority to sue the seller for a commission due to their contractual relationship. Other options, including the listing salesperson, selling salesperson, and selling broker, do not possess the necessary legal standing to pursue such claims, thereby making the listing broker the definitive correct answer.