15. Which solution demonstrates a contingency strategy in problem solving?
Answer: C
One person offers to eat at their friend's chosen restaurant if they get to choose the movie they will see afterward.
This solution illustrates a contingency strategy in problem solving as it involves negotiating terms that satisfy both parties' preferences. By offering a trade-off, one individual ensures they can enjoy a desired outcome later while still accommodating the friend's choice.
A) Both people settle for a different dish from a restaurant that they compromised on.
This option describes a situation of compromise but does not illustrate a contingency strategy. The individuals are not negotiating terms to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome; instead, they are simply settling for alternatives without any trade-off involved.
B) One person gets to eat at the place they chose, and the other person goes along with the choice to keep the mood light.
While this option shows an agreement, it does not reflect a contingency strategy. One person is acquiescing to the other's choice without any reciprocal arrangement or negotiation, which does not fulfill the criteria of a contingency.
C) One person offers to eat at their friend's chosen restaurant if they get to choose the movie they will see afterward.
This choice exemplifies a contingency strategy as it involves a negotiation where one person agrees to a less preferred option in exchange for a future benefit. This creates a win-win situation, highlighting effective problem-solving through compromise.
D) Both people agree to choose an entirely different restaurant so they both compromise their first choice.
This option describes a compromise but lacks the element of contingency. Both parties are simply agreeing to abandon their initial preferences without any negotiation or future considerations, which does not align with the concept of a contingency strategy.
Conclusion
Option C is the only choice that effectively demonstrates a contingency strategy through negotiation and trade-offs, allowing both parties to achieve a desirable outcome. The other options, while showcasing elements of compromise, fail to illustrate the principle of contingent agreements that satisfy both individuals' needs in a problem-solving context.