Question 26

President Nixon's message aims to persuade Congress to engage in actions addressing environmental damage.

The message emphasizes the necessity for Congress to actively participate in creating new strategies and regulations to combat environmental degradation. Nixon outlines the need for collective effort from government, industry, and citizens, highlighting the importance of Congress's involvement in addressing the issues.

A) to convince Congress that technological advancement and population growth must be slowed to protect the environment

This option misrepresents Nixon's message, which does not focus on hindering technological advancement or controlling population growth as solutions. Instead, he stresses the need for new philosophies and regulations, rather than limiting progress in these areas.

B) to convince Congress that industrial polluters of the air and water should not pay for cleaning the environment

This choice incorrectly interprets Nixon's intent. The speech advocates for shared responsibility, suggesting that all parties, including industry, should contribute to addressing environmental issues, rather than absolving industrial polluters of their responsibilities.

C) to convince Congress that it must take part in action to address human damage to the environment

This option accurately captures the essence of Nixon's message. He calls for Congress to engage in significant regulatory and participatory actions to combat environmental neglect and pollution, emphasizing a collaborative approach to tackle the problem.

D) to convince Congress that there should be no benefits for businesses that pollute the environment

While Nixon addresses the need for accountability, this statement oversimplifies his message. The focus is broader, urging Congress to ensure collective action rather than solely restricting benefits to polluters without exploring a comprehensive strategy for environmental protection.

Conclusion

The correct answer, option C, reflects President Nixon's clear call for Congressional involvement in environmental action, as he outlines the necessity for new regulations and philosophies. The other options either misinterpret his intent or fail to capture the comprehensive approach he advocates, which includes industry and citizen participation in addressing environmental issues.