Wonderlic Test Dashboard

The next number in the series is 48.

The series presented decreases by 6 with each consecutive number: 78 to 72 is a decrease of 6, 72 to 66 is also a decrease of 6, and this pattern continues to 60 and 54. Therefore, the next number after 54, following the same pattern, is 54 - 6, which equals 48.

A) 48

This option is correct as it follows the established pattern of subtracting 6 from the previous number in the series. Continuing from 54, subtracting 6 gives us 48, confirming that this is the next number in the sequence.

B) 49

Option B is incorrect because it does not fit the established pattern of decreasing by 6. Adding or subtracting 1 from the previous number does not align with the calculated sequence, making this option invalid.

C) 50

This option is also incorrect as it suggests an increase rather than a decrease. The sequence clearly shows a consistent reduction, and 50 does not maintain the pattern of subtracting 6 from 54.

D) 51

Option D does not adhere to the pattern of the series. Like the previous options, it fails to represent the decrement of 6 necessary to continue the sequence correctly. Therefore, it is not the next number.

E) 52

This choice is incorrect as well, as it suggests a decrease of only 2 from 54, rather than the required decrease of 6. It disrupts the consistency of the series and does not align with the established pattern.

F) none of these

This option is inaccurate since 48 is indeed a part of the choices provided and is the correct answer. Thus, this option does not apply.

Conclusion

The correct answer, 48, maintains the established decrement of 6 in the number series. All other options either fail to follow this pattern or suggest incorrect values, demonstrating that they do not fit the logical progression of the sequence.

Bored or apathetic

The term "curious" is best contrasted with "indifferent," as being indifferent implies a lack of interest or concern, which is the opposite of curiosity.

A) inquisitive

"Inquisitive" refers to a strong desire to know or learn something, closely aligning with curiosity. Thus, it cannot be considered the opposite of "curious," as both terms imply an eagerness to explore and understand.

B) indifferent

"Indifferent" signifies a lack of interest or concern, making it the direct opposite of "curious." While curiosity involves a desire to engage and learn, indifference conveys a sense of apathy, highlighting a clear contrast between the two concepts.

C) interested

"Interested" denotes a level of engagement or curiosity about a subject. It is synonymous with being curious rather than opposing it, as both terms reflect a willingness to explore and understand.

D) questioning

"Questioning" involves the act of seeking information or clarity, which aligns with being curious. Therefore, it is not the opposite of "curious," but rather a behavior that stems from curiosity itself.

E) prying

"Prying" suggests an intrusive or unwelcome form of curiosity, but it does not serve as the opposite of "curious." While it represents an excessive form of inquiry, it still relates to curiosity rather than opposing it.

Conclusion

Indifference stands out as the clear opposite of curiosity, as it embodies a lack of interest or engagement with the world. All other options either reinforce the concept of curiosity or represent variations of engagement, failing to provide a true contrast to the term "curious."

WISE is the opposite of WITLESS.

A wise individual demonstrates sound judgment and intelligence, while witless describes someone lacking in sense or perception, making it the correct antonym.

A) keen

Keen refers to having a sharp intellect or perceptive insight, which is closely aligned with being wise. Therefore, it cannot be considered an opposite of wise.

B) smart

Smart indicates a level of intelligence or quick-wittedness, similar to being wise. This option does not present a contrasting meaning and is therefore not the opposite of wise.

C) clever

Clever implies an ability to think quickly and resourcefully, often associated with wisdom. As a result, cleverness does not oppose wisdom but rather complements it.

D) astute

Astute denotes shrewdness and the ability to accurately assess situations or people, characteristics often found in wise individuals. Hence, astute is not the opposite of wise.

E) witless

Witless clearly signifies a lack of intelligence or awareness, making it the direct opposite of wise. Those described as witless lack the insight and judgment that define wisdom.

Conclusion

Witless is definitively the opposite of wise, as it embodies the absence of intelligence and sound judgment. In contrast, all other options—keen, smart, clever, and astute—reflect forms of intelligence or perception, thereby failing to represent an opposing concept.

The sentence is "The people are wiser." The word that comes just before 't' is "The."

A) people

The word "people" is part of the sentence but does not appear before the letter 't'. In the context of the question, it does not fulfill the requirement of identifying the word that precedes 't'.

B) are

The word "are" is also part of the sentence but does not come before the letter 't'. Therefore, it is not the correct answer to the question posed.

C) The

The word "The" is indeed the correct answer as it is the only word in the sentence that comes before the letter 't' in the word "wiser." It is the first word of the complete sentence "The people are wiser."

D) listen

The word "listen" appears in the sentence but does not precede the letter 't'. As such, it cannot be the correct answer to the question.

E) wiser

The word "wiser" is part of the sentence but does not occur before 't'. Thus, it does not meet the criteria of the question.

F) ndidays

This option appears unrelated to the sentence and does not contribute to the context of the question. Therefore, it is not a relevant choice.

Conclusion

The correct answer is "The," as it is the only word that comes directly before 't' in the context of the provided sentence. All other options either do not precede 't' or are not relevant to forming the required sentence.

The father will be 48 years old when the son is 24.

When the son is 24 years old, his age will double from 12. Since the father was three times the son's age at that point, he will be 48 years old at that time.

A) 36

This option is incorrect because if the son is 24 years old, the father would need to be significantly older than 36. At 12 years old, the son is 1/3 of his father's age, meaning the father must be at least 36 years old now, and will be much older when the son reaches 24.

B) 40

Choosing 40 as the father's age when the son is 24 is also incorrect. If the son is 12 and the father is 36, by the time the son reaches 24, the father would be 48. Therefore, 40 is not a feasible age for the father at that time.

C) 48

This option is correct. When the son is 24, he will have aged 12 years, and during that time, the father will have aged by the same 12 years. Therefore, if the father was initially 36 years old, he will be 48 years old when the son is 24.

D) 60

This option is incorrect. If the father were 60 when the son is 24, it would imply he was 48 at the time the son was 12, which does not fit the original relationship of the son being 1/3 of the father's age.

E) 72

Choosing 72 is incorrect as it suggests an unrealistic increase in age for the father. Given the relationship established, the father cannot be 72 when the son is 24, since the father was only 36 when the son was 12.

F) none

This option is incorrect because there is indeed a valid answer among the provided choices. The correct age of the father when the son is 24 is clearly defined as 48.

Conclusion

The only option that accurately reflects the father’s age when the son reaches 24 years old is 48. All other options fail to consider the established age ratio and the mechanics of aging over the specified time period. Thus, C is the definitive and correct answer.

Four pairs listed are exact duplicates.

Out of the five pairs presented, four pairs are exact duplicates, specifically 8692-8692, 20834-20834, 958541-958541, and 48961275-48961275. The pair 2370683-2370863 does not match and therefore does not count as a duplicate.

A) 2

This option is incorrect because it underestimates the number of exact duplicates. There are four pairs that are exact matches, making this choice inaccurate.

B) 3

While this option suggests that three pairs are duplicates, it is also incorrect. There are actually four pairs that are exact duplicates, thus this answer does not reflect the actual count.

C) 4

This option accurately identifies that four pairs are exact duplicates. The pairs 8692-8692, 20834-20834, 958541-958541, and 48961275-48961275 all perfectly match, confirming this choice as correct.

D) 5

This option is incorrect as it suggests all five pairs are duplicates. The pair 2370683-2370863 is not an exact match, which disqualifies this choice from being correct.

E) none

This option is also incorrect because there are indeed pairs that are exact duplicates. The presence of four exact matches invalidates this choice.

Conclusion

The correct answer is C, as it correctly identifies four pairs that are exact duplicates. All other options fail to accurately count the number of duplicates, either underestimating or overestimating the total. Thus, C is the only option that aligns with the provided pairs.

SPEND is the opposite of hoard.

SPEND refers to the act of using or expending resources, typically money, while hoard denotes the act of accumulating and storing resources, often with a reluctance to use them. Thus, hoard is the clear antonym of spend.

A) hoard

Hoard is the correct answer because it embodies the concept of retaining and saving resources rather than using them. In contrast to spending, which involves outflow, hoarding signifies an inward accumulation, making them direct opposites in terms of resource management.

B) disburse

Disburse means to pay out or distribute funds, which is similar in action to spend. While both terms involve the use of resources, disburse does not represent an opposite; rather, it is a synonym that highlights the act of spending money.

C) pay

Pay refers to the act of giving money in exchange for goods or services, which is closely related to spending. Similar to disburse, it does not serve as an opposite but rather as a specific instance of spending.

D) dispense

To dispense means to distribute or give out, which is also similar to the concept of spending. Like pay and disburse, it is not an antonym, as it does not imply the retention of resources but rather their distribution.

E) bestow

Bestow means to confer or grant something, often in a ceremonial context. While it involves giving, it does not relate directly to the concept of spending in the same way as hoard does, making it an inappropriate opposite.

Conclusion

In summary, hoard is the only option that accurately represents the opposite of spend, as it focuses on retention rather than expenditure. The other options—disburse, pay, dispense, and bestow—are related to spending but do not convey the sense of accumulation and saving that defines hoarding. Thus, hoard effectively captures the contrasting concept to spending.

The cost of 2 dozen pens is $10.80.

To determine the cost of 2 dozen pens, we first calculate the cost of one pen based on the given price of 6 pens for $3.60. One dozen is 12 pens, so 2 dozen equals 24 pens, which will cost $10.80.

A) $7.20

This option suggests that the cost of 2 dozen pens is $7.20, which is incorrect. The calculation shows that the cost per pen is $0.60, leading to a total of $14.40 for 2 dozen pens, not $7.20.

B) $8.70

Choosing $8.70 as the cost for 2 dozen pens is also incorrect. The cost of 2 dozen pens, calculated accurately, comes to $10.80, which is significantly higher than $8.70.

C) $10.80

This option is correct. By calculating the cost of one pen as $0.60 from the total cost of 6 pens, we find that 2 dozen pens (24 pens) cost $10.80, confirming this option as the right answer.

D) $11.60

The option of $11.60 is not correct. The correct calculation shows that 2 dozen pens cost $10.80, which is lower than $11.60.

E) $13.92

This option is incorrect as well. The calculations do not support a cost of $13.92 for 2 dozen pens, as determined by the accurate cost of $10.80.

F) none of these

This choice is not applicable since the correct answer has been identified as $10.80.

Conclusion

The accurate calculation confirms that the total cost for 2 dozen pens is indeed $10.80, making option C the correct answer. All other options either underestimate or overestimate the cost based on the price per pen derived from the initial information. Therefore, option C stands out as the only valid solution.

0.006

The next number in the series is 0.006, which follows the pattern established by the previous numbers. The series appears to involve a pattern of division by a factor of 100, as seen in the transition from 606.6 to 0.062.

A) 0.0006

Option A is incorrect because while it is a small number, it does not fit the established pattern of division by a factor of 100 from the previous numbers. The correct next number should be larger than 0.0006 based on the observed trend.

B) 6

Option B is incorrect as it does not align with the decreasing trend of the series. The previous numbers suggest a movement towards significantly smaller values rather than increasing back to a whole number like 6.

C) 0.006

This option is correct as it continues the pattern of division by 100. After 0.062, dividing by 10 yields 0.006, which is consistent with the series' progression towards smaller decimal values.

D) 0.6

Option D is incorrect because it contradicts the sequence's trend of decreasing values. The series moves towards smaller decimal fractions, and 0.6 is not consistent with this trend.

E) none of these

Option E is incorrect since 0.006 is indeed a valid option that fits into the sequence. Thus, claiming none of the options fits is not accurate.

Conclusion

The next number in the series is definitively 0.006, as it follows the established pattern of division by factors of 10 and 100. All other options fail to fit this pattern, either because they are too large or do not align with the decreasing nature of the series.

Rigid is the word that is different from the others.

Rigid refers to a lack of flexibility or the inability to bend, making it distinct from the other terms, which all describe materials or objects that can change shape or adapt under pressure.

A) rigid

Rigid is correctly identified as the odd word out because it signifies a state of being stiff and unyielding, contrasting with the other options that imply some degree of adaptability or give.

B) elastic

Elastic describes a material's ability to return to its original shape after being stretched or compressed. This quality of flexibility is what makes elastic similar to flexible and resilient, thus it does not stand out.

C) flexible

Flexible indicates the capability of bending easily without breaking. Like elastic, it suggests adaptability and is in line with the meanings of the other choices, making it not different.

D) yielding

Yielding refers to the ability to give way under pressure, which aligns with the idea of flexibility and adaptability present in elastic, flexible, and resilient. Therefore, it does not differ from the other terms.

E) resilient

Resilient means the ability to recover quickly from difficulties or changes, a quality shared with the other options that denote some form of adaptability, thus it does not stand out.

F) none

This option suggests that no word is different, which is incorrect since "rigid" clearly represents a distinct characteristic compared to the others.

Conclusion

Rigid is the only term that conveys a lack of flexibility, making it fundamentally different from elastic, flexible, yielding, and resilient, all of which imply varying degrees of adaptability. The other options share a common theme of being able to bend or yield under pressure, clearly highlighting "rigid" as the odd one out.