44. An owner signed a contract to sell an apartment building. Just before closing, the owner informed the buyers that the owner would NOT sell the property. A lawsuit filed by the buyers would be for

Answer: A

Explanation:

Buyers would file a lawsuit for specific performance.

In this scenario, the buyers would seek specific performance as a remedy, compelling the owner to fulfill the contract and complete the sale of the apartment building.

A) specific performance

Specific performance is a legal remedy that compels a party to execute the terms of a contract when they have unjustly refused to do so. In this case, since the owner has backed out of the sale after the contract was signed, the buyers can file a lawsuit for specific performance to enforce the contract and obtain ownership of the property.

B) lis pendens

Lis pendens is a legal notice indicating that a lawsuit has been filed concerning a property, which serves to inform potential buyers of the existing claim. While the buyers may eventually file a lis pendens after initiating a lawsuit, it is not the primary action they would take in this situation, as their main goal is to enforce the contract through specific performance.

C) quiet title action

A quiet title action is a lawsuit filed to establish a party's title to real property and eliminate any challenges or claims to that title. This is not applicable in this case because the buyers are not disputing ownership but rather seeking to enforce the sale agreement that the owner has reneged on.

D) a deficiency judgment

A deficiency judgment arises when a property is sold for less than the amount owed on the mortgage, allowing the lender to seek the remaining balance from the borrower. This option does not apply here, as there is no mortgage involved in the sale of the apartment building, and the buyers are not seeking compensation for a shortfall; instead, they wish to enforce the original sales contract.

Conclusion

The correct answer is specific performance, as it directly addresses the buyers' need to compel the owner to complete the contract after the owner's refusal to sell. All other options either do not pertain to the situation or represent legal actions that do not align with the buyers' objective of enforcing the sales contract.