22. Prior to hand hygiene initiative, staff reviewed existing materials (proposals, policies, training). What research method?

Answer: D

Explanation:

Policy review

The research method utilized by the staff prior to the hand hygiene initiative was a policy review. This approach involved examining existing proposals, policies, and training materials to inform their practices.

A) Focus group

A focus group is a qualitative research method that gathers a small group of individuals to discuss and provide feedback on a specific topic. This method would not apply in this context since the staff were reviewing existing materials rather than conducting discussions or interviews with participants.

B) In-person survey

An in-person survey involves collecting data directly from respondents through questionnaires or interviews. This method is not relevant here, as the staff did not engage with participants to gather new data but instead analyzed existing documentation.

C) Systematic review

A systematic review is a comprehensive method of synthesizing research findings from multiple studies to address a specific research question. While it involves thorough analysis, the context indicates that the staff focused on reviewing internal materials rather than synthesizing external research, making this option incorrect.

D) Policy review

A policy review is the appropriate method as it entails examining and evaluating existing policies, proposals, and training materials. This directly aligns with the staff's actions in preparing for the hand hygiene initiative by assessing what was already available.

Conclusion

The policy review is definitively the correct answer because it accurately describes the process of analyzing existing documents to inform future practices. In contrast, the other options—focus group, in-person survey, and systematic review—do not fit the context of reviewing pre-existing materials in preparation for a new initiative.