85. Quality Supermarkets has taken occupancy of a retail building and has a long-term lease. As part of their fit-up, they bolt to the floor their meat and dairy coolers, shelves and check-out stands. When Quality Supermarkets vacates the property at the end of the lease, will Quality Supermarkets be legally entitled to remove these fixtures?

Answer: D

Explanation:

Quality Supermarkets will be legally entitled to remove these fixtures if removed prior to the end of the lease.

Quality Supermarkets can legally remove the fixtures they installed, such as the coolers and check-out stands, as long as they do so before the lease concludes. This is due to the nature of these fixtures being classified as trade fixtures, which are typically removable by the tenant.

A) No, because they are trade fixtures.

This option is incorrect because trade fixtures are typically removable by the tenant. While they are considered part of the business operation, tenants have the right to remove them before vacating the premises, provided this is done within the lease term.

B) Yes, because they are appurtenances.

This option is also incorrect. Appurtenances are generally considered to be permanent fixtures that are tied to the property. In this case, the coolers and shelves are trade fixtures, not appurtenances, and thus can be removed by the tenant.

C) No, because they are bolted to the floor.

This statement is misleading. Although the fixtures are bolted to the floor, this does not prevent Quality Supermarkets from removing them. As long as the removal occurs before the end of the lease, they can legally take their fixtures with them.

D) Yes, if removed prior to the end of the lease.

This option is correct. Quality Supermarkets retains the right to remove their fixtures as long as they do so before the lease ends. This aligns with the general understanding of tenant rights regarding trade fixtures.

Conclusion

Quality Supermarkets is allowed to remove their fixtures if they do so before the lease ends, affirming their rights as a tenant concerning trade fixtures. The other options incorrectly classify the nature of the fixtures or misinterpret the tenant's rights, which reinforces why option D is the only valid choice in this scenario.