Question 66

The author seems to favor the use of lightning rods.

The author explains how lightning rods protect buildings by providing a low resistance path for lightning, indicating a positive view towards their effectiveness in preventing damage.

A) Disapprove of the use of lightning rods

This option is incorrect as the author does not express any disapproval of lightning rods. Instead, the text highlights their purpose and effectiveness in protecting buildings from lightning strikes.

B) Neutral towards the use of lightning rods

This choice is also incorrect. The author provides specific details about how lightning rods function and their benefits, which suggests an informed stance rather than a neutral one.

C) Favor the use of lightning rods

This is the correct option. The author clearly articulates the protective role of lightning rods and their importance in safely directing lightning to the ground, demonstrating a favorable attitude towards their use.

D) Suggest alternatives to lightning rods

This option is incorrect as the author does not propose any alternatives to lightning rods. The focus remains on their utility and functionality in protecting structures from lightning strikes.

Conclusion

The author’s explicit explanation of how lightning rods work and their significance in safeguarding buildings clearly illustrates a favorable stance towards their use. In contrast, the other options misinterpret the author's position, as they either suggest disapproval, neutrality, or alternatives that are not present in the discussion.