Question 66

The author seems to favor the use of lightning rods.

The text illustrates a positive view of lightning rods by explaining their function in protecting buildings from lightning strikes. The author highlights how they form a low resistance path for lightning, ensuring safety by defusing the electricity into the ground rather than allowing it to enter the building.

A) Disapprove of the use of lightning rods

This option is incorrect because the author does not express any disapproval of lightning rods. Instead, the description emphasizes their importance in protecting buildings, indicating a favorable stance.

B) Neutral towards the use of lightning rods

While neutrality is not expressed in the text, this option is incorrect. The author conveys a clear understanding of the benefits of lightning rods, suggesting that a neutral position would not accurately represent the author's perspective.

C) Favor the use of lightning rods

This option is correct, as the author explicitly details how lightning rods protect buildings by providing a low resistance path for lightning. This positive explanation indicates a clear favor for their use, highlighting their effectiveness in ensuring safety.

D) Suggest alternatives to lightning rods

This option is incorrect because the text does not present any alternatives to lightning rods. Instead, it focuses solely on the advantages of using lightning rods, without mentioning other options for lightning protection.

Conclusion

The author definitively favors the use of lightning rods as they outline their protective benefits against lightning strikes. All other options fail to capture the author's perspective, as they either misinterpret the text's intent or suggest positions not supported by the provided information.