Question 10

The information presented is slanted against people with piercing voices.

The extract indicates that harsh voice qualities, such as being shrill or piercing, are generally perceived negatively and can make speaking uncomfortable for listeners. This suggests a bias against those who possess piercing voices, as it highlights the undesirable effects of such qualities on communication.

A) Slanted in favor of newscasters

This option is incorrect because the extract does not present any positive attributes regarding newscasters. Instead, it focuses on the negative impact of voice qualities, suggesting that harshness is undesirable, which does not support newscasters.

B) Slanted against people with deep voices

This option is also incorrect. The extract does not criticize deep voices; rather, it implies that higher-pitched voices are often harsher and less desirable. Deep voices are not mentioned as being problematic in this context.

C) Slanted against people with piercing voices

This option is correct as the extract explicitly states that harsh voice qualities, including piercing tones, are unpleasant and can cause discomfort in listeners. It indicates a negative perception of this vocal quality.

D) Balanced in its approach

This option is incorrect because the extract presents a clear bias against certain voice qualities, particularly those that are harsh or piercing. A balanced approach would not favor or disfavor any particular vocal quality, but the text clearly highlights the negative aspects of harsh tones.

Conclusion

The extract's focus on the negative perceptions of harsh and piercing voice qualities establishes a clear bias against individuals who possess such vocal traits. While it discusses the challenges that higher-pitched voices face, the emphasis on discomfort and unpleasantness associated with harshness demonstrates that option C is definitively correct, while the other options fail to accurately reflect the extract's content.