Question 29

The author depicts the relationship between the “noble impulses of humanity, the dreams of poets and the agonies of martyrs” and “Greed” as that of servants and master.

The relationship is characterized as one of servitude, where noble impulses and altruistic ideals serve under the dominant force of Greed, which operates as a master. This portrayal suggests that the higher ideals of humanity are often subjugated to the selfish motivations represented by Greed.

A) followers and leader

This option implies a relationship where noble impulses would be passive followers to a leading figure of Greed. However, the metaphorical representation in the excerpt suggests a more hierarchical relationship where Greed exerts control, making "servants and master" a more fitting description.

B) servants and master

This choice accurately reflects the dynamics presented in the excerpt. The noble impulses, dreams, and agonies represent virtues that serve a higher moral purpose, while Greed stands as a dominating force, controlling and overshadowing these noble qualities.

C) writers and reader

This option represents a relationship focused on the act of communication and interpretation, which does not align with the hierarchical and controlling nature described in the excerpt. The relationship does not capture the essence of Greed dominating noble impulses.

D) doctors and patient

The relationship between doctors and patients is one of care and service, which does not fit the context of the excerpt. The depiction of Greed as a master does not resonate with the medical dynamics of authority and care found in this option.

Conclusion

The correct answer, "servants and master," encapsulates the author's perspective on the relationship between altruism and Greed, emphasizing how noble ideals are often overshadowed by selfish motivations. The other options fail to convey this hierarchical relationship, highlighting the unique dominance of Greed over noble impulses as depicted in the text.