Question 35

The author seems to favor moderation.

The extract indicates that while food and drink are necessary, their abuse can lead to serious health issues, suggesting that the author advocates for a balanced approach to consumption rather than extremes.

A) Favor moderation.

This option is correct as it aligns with the author's perspective on food and drink. The author acknowledges the necessity of these elements in life while warning against their abuse, implying that moderation is key to avoiding health problems.

B) Oppose regulation of personal habits.

This option is incorrect because the author does not discuss the regulation of personal habits. Instead, the focus is on the consequences of abuse and the importance of moderation, which does not imply an opposition to regulation.

C) Favor a strict diet.

This option is incorrect as the author does not advocate for a strict diet. The emphasis is on moderation rather than strict restrictions, indicating that the author believes in a balanced approach instead of severe dietary limitations.

D) Oppose drinking alcohol.

This option is incorrect because the author does not outright oppose drinking alcohol. The focus is on the negative consequences of alcohol abuse, rather than a blanket opposition to its consumption.

Conclusion

In summary, the author clearly favors moderation in the consumption of food and drink, as evidenced by the acknowledgment of their necessity and the dangers of their abuse. The other options fail to capture this nuanced view, as they either misinterpret the author's stance or introduce concepts that are not present in the extract.