HESI A2 Grammar Exams — Grammar HESI A2 Practice
1. Before his death at age 82, comedian Rodney Dangerfield's motto was, 'I don't get any respect.'
Answer: A
No
Rodney Dangerfield's motto, 'I don't get any respect,' reflects a sentiment that was consistently part of his comedic persona. The phrase suggests a lack of respect throughout his life, making the answer "No" appropriate in the context of the question.
A) No
This option correctly aligns with the context of the question, indicating that Dangerfield's motto was a statement of his experience rather than a question of existence or timing. His emphasis on not receiving respect was central to his comedy and identity, thus affirming that the answer is indeed "No".
B) Was
This option is incorrect as it suggests a past tense that does not apply to the ongoing nature of Dangerfield's sentiment. While he did express this motto throughout his life, the question requires an affirmation of the motto's relevance, which "Was" fails to provide.
C) At
The choice "At" does not make sense in this context as it lacks a clear connection to the sentiment of Dangerfield's motto. It does not address the essence of the statement regarding respect and fails to capture the meaning intended in the question.
D) Before
This option is also incorrect because it implies a temporal context that does not relate directly to Dangerfield's motto. "Before" does not adequately convey the ongoing nature of his expression about respect, making it an unsuitable choice.
Conclusion
The answer "No" is definitively correct as it encapsulates the essence of Rodney Dangerfield's lifelong comedic assertion regarding respect. All other options fail to convey the intended meaning of his motto, either by altering the tense or failing to address the sentiment effectively. Thus, "No" stands out as the most accurate representation of Dangerfield's enduring message.
2. Which of the following sentences is grammatically correct?
Answer: A
The campus is farther down the road.
This sentence correctly uses "farther" to indicate a physical distance, making it grammatically accurate in the context of the question.
A) The campus is farther down the road.
This option is correct as it uses "farther" appropriately to refer to a greater physical distance. The sentence structure is also clear and grammatically sound, indicating a specific location along the road.
B) The campus is farther up the road.
While this sentence is grammatically correct, it may lead to ambiguity in meaning. The use of "up" is less conventional when discussing distance in this context, as "down" more clearly indicates a direction along a road, which could confuse the reader.
C) I will have to consider further before making a decision.
This sentence is incorrect in the context of the question because it uses "further" incorrectly. "Further" is typically used for figurative or abstract distances, while "farther" is preferred for physical distances, making this option inappropriate for the grammatical correctness being tested.
D) The hospital was farther away than he thought.
This sentence is also grammatically correct; however, it does not apply to the context of the original question, which specifically asks for the correct application of "farther" in relation to the campus and its location. Thus, while correct, it does not answer the question appropriately.
Conclusion
Option A is definitively correct as it accurately employs "farther" in a context indicating physical distance. Options B and D, while grammatically correct, do not fit the specific context of the question regarding the campus. Option C misuses "further," failing to meet the grammatical requirement being assessed.
3. During the storm, the glass in three of the windows was broken.
Answer: C
The glass in three of the windows was broken.
The phrase "was broken" correctly indicates that the action of breaking occurred in the past and refers specifically to the glass in the windows during the storm.
A) Broken
"Broken" is simply the past participle form of the verb and lacks the necessary auxiliary verb to convey the passive voice needed in this context. It does not indicate when the action occurred nor does it fit grammatically into the sentence structure.
B) Breaks
"Breaks" is the present tense form of the verb, which is inappropriate for describing an action that took place during the storm. This choice does not convey the past action required by the context.
C) Was broken
"Was broken" is the correct choice as it uses the past tense in the passive voice, effectively communicating that the action of breaking occurred to the glass in the windows during the storm.
D) Were broken
"Were broken" is also in the passive voice but is incorrect because it implies a plural subject. Since the subject is "the glass," which is singular in this context, this option does not correctly match the subject-verb agreement needed.
Conclusion
Option C, "was broken," is definitively correct as it accurately conveys the past passive action affecting the singular subject, "the glass." Options A and B fail to provide the appropriate tense and structure, while D misaligns with the subject's number, confirming that C is the only suitable choice.
4. Since the factory was destroyed, the company has ------------- business to do.
Answer: A
No business to do.
The sentence indicates that due to the destruction of the factory, the company has no business activities left to pursue. This aligns perfectly with the word "no," which conveys the absence of business.
A) No
This option is correct as it clearly communicates that the company has no business to conduct following the destruction of the factory. The use of "no" effectively negates any potential business activities, emphasizing total absence.
B) Not
This choice is incorrect because "not" does not fit grammatically in the sentence. It fails to provide a complete thought regarding the company’s business status, leaving the sentence sounding incomplete or awkward.
C) None
"None" is also inappropriate in this context as it does not fit the sentence structure. While it indicates absence, it would require a different construction to be grammatically correct, such as "the company has none of the business."
D) Neither
This option is incorrect because "neither" is typically used to refer to two items or options and does not apply here. It does not convey the intended meaning of the company lacking business due to the factory's destruction.
Conclusion
The correct answer, "no," accurately conveys the total lack of business opportunities available to the company after the factory's destruction. The other options fail either grammatically or semantically, making them unsuitable for the context of the sentence. Thus, "no" is definitively the most appropriate choice.
Answer: A
Harder
The student thought the second test was harder than the first test, indicating that the second test presented a greater challenge.
A) harder
This option is correct because "harder" is the comparative form of the adjective "hard." It appropriately indicates a comparison between the difficulty levels of the two tests.
B) more hard
This option is incorrect as "more hard" is not a grammatically accepted form in English. The comparative form of "hard" is "harder," making this choice invalid.
C) hardest
This option is incorrect because "hardest" is the superlative form of the adjective "hard." It suggests the highest degree of difficulty among three or more items, rather than making a direct comparison between two tests.
D) most hardest
This option is incorrect because "most hardest" is a double superlative, which is not grammatically correct. The proper usage would be either "hardest" or "more hard," but the latter is already invalid.
Conclusion
The correct answer "harder" is the only grammatically appropriate choice that accurately conveys the comparative nature of the sentence. All other options fail to meet the standards of English grammar for expressing comparison, thereby reinforcing the correctness of "harder" in this context.
Answer: D
The correct part of the sentence that needs to be corrected is "Went form."
The phrase "went form" contains a typographical error, as it should be "went from." This alteration is necessary to convey the correct transition from one state to another.
A) To a
The phrase "to a" is grammatically correct in this context. It appropriately introduces the description of the man's transformation and does not require correction.
B) Very strong
The phrase "very strong" is also correct and effectively describes the man's new state. There are no grammatical issues with this part of the sentence.
C) Being
The word "being" is used correctly in this context to indicate the state of the man prior to his transformation. It does not need alteration and serves its purpose in the sentence effectively.
D) Went form
The phrase "went form" is incorrect due to the typographical error; it should read "went from." This change is essential for the sentence to convey the intended meaning accurately.
Conclusion
The phrase "went form" is definitively incorrect due to the typographical error, making it the only part of the sentence that requires correction. All other options are grammatically sound and contribute effectively to the meaning of the sentence. Thus, option D is the only choice that fails to meet the necessary grammatical standards.
7. Which of the following sentences is grammatically correct? (misplaced modifier)
Answer: A
The child's torn shirt was lying on the floor.
This sentence correctly places the modifier "torn" before the noun "shirt," clearly indicating that the shirt is torn, not the child.
A) The child's torn shirt was lying on the floor
This option is grammatically correct as the adjective "torn" appropriately modifies "shirt," making it clear that the shirt is the item that is torn. The structure of the sentence is straightforward and avoids any ambiguity.
B) The torn child's shirt was lying on the floor
This option is incorrect because it implies that the child is torn rather than the shirt. The placement of "torn" before "child" creates confusion about what is being described.
C) The child's shirt was lying on the floor torn
This option is also incorrect as it places the modifier "torn" at the end of the sentence, which is not the conventional way to modify a noun in English. This construction can lead to misinterpretation of what is being described.
D) The child's shirt, torn, was lying on the floor
While this option is grammatically correct, it uses a more complex construction with the use of commas. It implies that "torn" is additional information rather than a direct description of the shirt, which can be less clear than the straightforward structure in option A.
Conclusion
The first option, "The child's torn shirt was lying on the floor," is the most straightforward and grammatically correct choice, as it clearly indicates that it is the shirt that is torn. Other options either misplace the modifier or complicate the sentence unnecessarily, leading to potential confusion about what is being described. Therefore, option A stands out as the only unequivocally correct sentence.
Answer: A
Be observed is NOT CORRECTLY USED in the sentence.
The phrase "be observed" is incorrectly used in the context of the sentence. The correct form should include a modal or auxiliary verb to convey the intended meaning of obligation or necessity.
A) Be observed
This option is incorrect because the phrase lacks a subject or a modal verb to indicate the necessity of observing confidentiality. A correct construction would be "should be observed" or "must be observed," which properly conveys the requirement to maintain confidentiality.
B) By
The word "by" is not present in the original sentence and does not apply here. Therefore, it is irrelevant to the correctness of the sentence structure.
C) Can be
"Can be" is a grammatically correct phrase that indicates possibility. If used in the sentence, it would imply that confidentiality has the potential to be observed, which is appropriate in certain contexts.
D) Should not
"Should not" is also a grammatically correct phrase. If included in the sentence, it would imply a prohibition against not observing confidentiality. However, it is not relevant to the original sentence's correctness.
Conclusion
The phrase "be observed" is definitively incorrect due to its lack of a modal verb or subject, which is essential for proper sentence structure. All other options either do not apply or present grammatically correct alternatives that do not directly address the error in the original sentence. Thus, "be observed" is the only option that fails to meet the standard of correctness required in this context.
Answer: D
Medication is a direct object in the sentence.
In the sentence provided, "medication" serves as the direct object because it is what the patient is being helped with by the nurse. The verb "helped" indicates the action that is directly affecting the object.
A) Helped
"Helped" is the verb in the sentence and indicates the action performed by the nurse. It does not function as a direct object because it does not receive the action of the verb; instead, it describes what the nurse is doing.
B) Nurse
"Nurse" is the subject of the sentence, as it is the one performing the action of helping. It cannot be a direct object because it does not receive the action of the verb.
C) Patient
"Patient" is the indirect object in the sentence, as it is the recipient of the action. The nurse is helping the patient, but the direct object of the action is what the patient is receiving help with, which is "medication."
D) Medication
"Medication" is the correct answer as it is the direct object of the verb "helped." It answers the question of what the nurse is helping the patient with, making it directly affected by the action.
Conclusion
The correct answer is "medication" because it is the noun that directly receives the action of the verb "helped." All other options fail to serve as direct objects, as they either represent the subject or an indirect recipient of the action rather than what is being acted upon.
Answer: C
The child's fever was too high for him to lie comfortably in bed.
Using "too" in this context indicates that the fever is excessively high, preventing the child from lying comfortably in bed.
A) to
The word "to" does not convey the necessary meaning in this sentence. It does not indicate the degree of the fever's severity, which is essential to understanding why the child cannot lie comfortably.
B) much
The use of "much" would be grammatically incorrect in this context. While "much" can indicate a large amount, it does not appropriately describe the extent of the fever in relation to the child's comfort in bed.
C) too
Using "too" correctly expresses that the fever is excessively high, which directly affects the child’s ability to lie comfortably in bed. This choice accurately reflects the intended meaning of the sentence.
D) more
The word "more" does not fit within the context of the sentence. It implies a comparative increase rather than indicating an excessive level, which is critical for understanding the child's discomfort.
Conclusion
The choice "too" is definitively correct as it effectively communicates the excessive nature of the fever, which is crucial for explaining the child's inability to lie comfortably. In contrast, the other options fail to convey this essential meaning, making them incorrect for the sentence's context.