Question 1

Some believe them to be about one million years old.

The artifacts discovered on the island of Flores are suggested to be almost one million years old, which indicates a significant age that impacts our understanding of early human capabilities.

A) They reflect extraordinary manufacturing skill.

This option is incorrect because the passage states that the artifacts do not possess a precocious level of craftsmanship. Therefore, attributing extraordinary manufacturing skill to them contradicts the information provided.

B) Some believe them to be about one million years old.

This statement is accurate as the passage specifically mentions that the artifacts discovered are suggested to be almost one million years old, highlighting the implications such age has on our understanding of early human capabilities.

C) They were found on a water-transport craft.

This option is incorrect as the passage does not indicate that the artifacts were found on a water-transport craft. Instead, it discusses the need for such a craft to reach Flores, not the context of their discovery.

D) Some regard them as similar to artifacts found on Java.

This option is not supported by the passage. While it discusses the journey from Java to Flores, it does not mention any comparisons between the artifacts themselves, making this statement unfounded.

E) They were effective for storing a variety of foods.

This option is incorrect because the passage does not provide any information about the artifacts being used for food storage or their effectiveness in that regard.

Conclusion

The correct answer, option B, is supported directly by the passage, which mentions the age of the artifacts as a significant factor in understanding early human abilities. All other options either misinterpret the information presented or introduce concepts not discussed in the passage, reinforcing that B is the only accurate statement regarding the artifacts.