Question 39

The final sentence of the passage can be best described as a comparison of two systems of writing.

The final sentence highlights the distinction between Western and Chinese calligraphy, suggesting that while Western calligraphy captures static forms, Chinese calligraphy embodies movement and fluidity. This comparison underscores the unique characteristics and philosophies behind each style of writing.

A) a description of the process used in producing calligraphy

This option is incorrect because the final sentence does not delve into the specific techniques or processes of creating calligraphy. Instead, it focuses on the broader philosophical differences between Western and Chinese calligraphy.

B) an expression of the author's love of Chinese calligraphy

While the author may have an appreciation for Chinese calligraphy, the final sentence does not explicitly express personal emotions or preferences. It is more analytical, comparing the two styles rather than conveying affection.

C) a recounting of how the Chinese discovered writing

This option is incorrect as the final sentence does not discuss the origins or discovery of writing in China. It centers on the artistic differences between Chinese and Western calligraphy rather than historical accounts.

D) a statement of goals calligraphers seek to achieve

Although there are goals associated with calligraphy, the final sentence does not articulate specific aims or objectives that calligraphers pursue. Instead, it contrasts the outcomes of different styles of writing.

E) a comparison of two systems of writing

This option is correct as the final sentence effectively contrasts Western calligraphy, described as producing "arrested forms," with Chinese calligraphy, which is characterized as an "art of movement." This comparison highlights the philosophical differences in how each culture approaches the art of writing.

Conclusion

The correct answer is Option E, as it accurately captures the essence of the final sentence, which emphasizes the differences between Western and Chinese calligraphy. Other options fail to address the comparative nature of the statement, focusing instead on unrelated aspects of calligraphy. Thus, the passage's concluding thought clearly positions it as a reflection on the distinct qualities of two prominent writing systems.