3. In context, where would the following sentence best be placed: 'The 1992 Constitution made Guarani equal to Spanish, and officials say that they have aggressively expanded Guarani instruction in primary schools'?
Answer: D
The sentence best fits after sentence 14.
The sentence 'The 1992 Constitution made Guarani equal to Spanish, and officials say that they have aggressively expanded Guarani instruction in primary schools' would naturally follow after sentence 14, as it discusses the strengthening of Guarani following the establishment of democratic rule in the 1990s.
A) After sentence 1
Placing the sentence after sentence 1 would be inappropriate because the context at that point is focused on the general situation of Guarani in Paraguay, without delving into the specifics of the constitution or educational reforms that occurred later.
B) After sentence 6
This option is also incorrect as sentence 6 addresses General Stroessner's influence on Guarani, and introducing a discussion on the 1992 Constitution at this point would disrupt the flow and thematic coherence of the paragraph.
C) After sentence 10
Although this option might seem plausible, sentence 10 discusses the transition into democratic rule and does not provide a direct lead-in to the constitutional changes regarding Guarani. Thus, the sentence would feel out of place here.
D) After sentence 14
This is the correct placement for the sentence since it follows the discussion on the strengthening of Guarani after the establishment of democracy. It logically connects the constitutional reforms to the subsequent educational policies that expanded Guarani instruction.
Conclusion
The correct placement of the sentence after sentence 14 allows for a seamless transition into the topic of Guarani's elevation to equality with Spanish and the expansion of its instruction in schools. Other options fail to maintain the logical flow of the argument and do not align with the historical context surrounding Guarani's status in Paraguay.