ACCUPLACER Next Generation Reading Exams — ACCUPLACER Next Generation Reading Test Answers
Answer: D
Rather than addressing the facts, the defense attorney relied on innuendo making veiled references to deficiencies in the witness's character.
The defense attorney's approach was characterized by the use of innuendo, which involves making indirect or subtle suggestions about the witness's character without stating them outright. This technique allowed the attorney to undermine the witness's credibility without directly addressing the factual evidence.
A) paraphrase
Paraphrasing involves restating someone else's ideas or statements in different words. In this context, it does not accurately describe the attorney's strategy, which was more about insinuation rather than rewording existing statements.
B) presumption
A presumption is an assumption made without proof. While the defense attorney may have made assumptions about the witness, presumption does not capture the subtlety of suggesting character flaws without direct evidence, which is central to the question.
C) skepticism
Skepticism refers to doubt or questioning of the validity of something. Although the attorney may have exhibited skepticism towards the witness's testimony, this term does not encompass the tactic of implying negative traits without direct accusations, which is better described by innuendo.
D) innuendo
Innuendo is the correct answer as it precisely describes the tactic used by the defense attorney—making indirect, subtle suggestions about the witness's character that imply deficiencies without stating them outright. This method effectively casts doubt on the witness's credibility while avoiding direct confrontation of the facts.
Conclusion
The use of innuendo is definitive in this context as it highlights the attorney's strategy of undermining the witness's character through insinuation rather than factual rebuttal. All other options fail to capture the essence of this indirect approach, which is critical in legal arguments where character assessments can significantly impact the outcome.
2. The author of Passage 2 suggests that 'some' would most likely view the description in Passage 1 as
Answer: B
Some would most likely view the description in Passage 1 as overly optimistic.
The author implies that the description in Passage 1 may not accurately reflect the harsh realities faced by individuals in the depicted environment. This suggests that some readers might interpret the tone as excessively positive, overlooking the struggles present in the setting.
A) surprisingly apt
This option suggests that the description accurately captures the essence of the situation, which contradicts the author's intent in Passage 2. The passage implies a disconnect between the idealized view and the actual experiences, so labeling it as “apt” does not align with the author's perspective.
B) overly optimistic
This choice reflects the author's concern that the description in Passage 1 may present a more favorable view than warranted. By using this term, the author suggests that such a portrayal could lead to misunderstandings about the challenges faced in the depicted environment, making this the correct interpretation.
C) needlessly pedantic
Describing the passage as “needlessly pedantic” implies that it is overly focused on trivial details without offering substantive insight. However, the author does not critique the description for being too technical or academic; rather, the focus is on its optimistic nature, making this option incorrect.
D) insufficiently detailed
This option would imply that the description lacks necessary information to be meaningful. However, the author does not express that the description fails to provide details; instead, the emphasis is on the perception of the description being too optimistic. Thus, this choice does not accurately represent the author's viewpoint.
Conclusion
The correct answer, "overly optimistic," captures the author's critique of the tone in Passage 1, suggesting that it may not fully convey the complexities of the environment. All other options either misinterpret the author's intent or focus on aspects not addressed in the passage, reinforcing why "overly optimistic" is the most fitting characterization.
Answer: D
The sentence best fits after sentence 14.
The sentence 'The 1992 Constitution made Guarani equal to Spanish, and officials say that they have aggressively expanded Guarani instruction in primary schools' would naturally follow after sentence 14, as it discusses the strengthening of Guarani following the establishment of democratic rule in the 1990s.
A) After sentence 1
Placing the sentence after sentence 1 would be inappropriate because the context at that point is focused on the general situation of Guarani in Paraguay, without delving into the specifics of the constitution or educational reforms that occurred later.
B) After sentence 6
This option is also incorrect as sentence 6 addresses General Stroessner's influence on Guarani, and introducing a discussion on the 1992 Constitution at this point would disrupt the flow and thematic coherence of the paragraph.
C) After sentence 10
Although this option might seem plausible, sentence 10 discusses the transition into democratic rule and does not provide a direct lead-in to the constitutional changes regarding Guarani. Thus, the sentence would feel out of place here.
D) After sentence 14
This is the correct placement for the sentence since it follows the discussion on the strengthening of Guarani after the establishment of democracy. It logically connects the constitutional reforms to the subsequent educational policies that expanded Guarani instruction.
Conclusion
The correct placement of the sentence after sentence 14 allows for a seamless transition into the topic of Guarani's elevation to equality with Spanish and the expansion of its instruction in schools. Other options fail to maintain the logical flow of the argument and do not align with the historical context surrounding Guarani's status in Paraguay.
4. According to the passage, Margaret and others at Naxos generally regard Helga as
Answer: D
Margaret and others at Naxos generally regard Helga as somewhat intimidating.
Helga is perceived as somewhat intimidating by Margaret and the other faculty members at Naxos. This is indicated by Margaret's cautious demeanor and her admission that "nearly everyone was" afraid of Helga, suggesting a level of respect mixed with apprehension.
A) highly reliable
This option is incorrect because there is no indication in the passage that Helga is regarded as reliable. In fact, her indifference towards attending her classes and her decision to leave Naxos suggest a lack of dependability in her role as a teacher.
B) unusually friendly
This option is also incorrect. The passage highlights Helga's aloofness and lack of engagement with others, as seen in her dismissal of Margaret's offer for help and her general disinterest in interactions, which does not align with being described as friendly.
C) relatively practical
This option is not accurate. Helga's actions and thoughts reveal a sense of dissatisfaction with her situation rather than practicality. Her decision to not attend class and her disdain for the food served at Naxos reflect a more emotional and subjective perspective than a practical one.
D) somewhat intimidating
This option is correct. The passage explicitly states that "nearly everyone was" afraid of Helga, indicating that her presence and demeanor are intimidating to others. Margaret’s hesitance to press Helga with questions further underscores this perception.
Conclusion
The correct answer is that Helga is regarded as somewhat intimidating, which is supported by the text's portrayal of her as someone who discourages inquiries and instills fear in her colleagues. Other options fail because they do not align with the descriptions or sentiments expressed by Margaret and others at Naxos towards Helga.
5. Which sentence should be deleted because it contains irrelevant information?
Answer: C
Sentence 9 should be deleted because it contains irrelevant information.
Sentence 9 discusses Lorca's travel to Havana, Cuba, which does not contribute directly to the main narrative of his life and works mentioned in the surrounding sentences.
A) Sentence 6
Sentence 6 is relevant as it highlights the impact of "Gypsy Ballads" on Lorca's fame, which is central to understanding his significance as a poet. Deleting this sentence would omit key information about his literary contributions.
B) Sentence 7
Sentence 7 provides insight into Lorca's decision to travel to New York, reflecting his aspirations and the context of his time. This sentence is important for understanding his artistic journey and should not be deleted.
C) Sentence 9
Sentence 9 states that Lorca traveled to Havana, Cuba. While this may be a fact about his life, it does not directly connect to the central themes of his literary work or the significance of his time in New York, making it the least relevant sentence in this context.
D) Sentence 14
Sentence 14 discusses the tragic end of Lorca's life, which is highly relevant as it underscores the political climate of Spain during his time and the consequences faced by artists. Deleting this sentence would remove critical context regarding his legacy.
Conclusion
Sentence 9 should be deleted as it diverges from the main focus of Lorca's literary achievements and experiences in New York. In contrast, the other sentences provide essential context regarding his works, aspirations, and tragic fate, making them integral to understanding his life and impact on literature.
6. At the end of Passage 2, the expert emphasizes
Answer: D
Quality over quantity
The expert emphasizes that the significance of a blog lies not in the number of readers but in the quality and influence of those who do engage with the content. This perspective highlights the importance of meaningful connections over mere metrics.
A) function over form
This option is incorrect because the expert's focus is not on the functionality of the blog versus its appearance, but rather on the value of the audience that engages with the blog. The discussion does not pertain to aesthetic considerations.
B) theory over practice
This choice is also incorrect as the expert does not prioritize theoretical concepts over practical application. Instead, the emphasis is on who is reading the blog rather than the theoretical aspects of blogging.
C) ethics over ambition
This option does not align with the expert's message, which does not address ethical considerations compared to ambition. The focus is specifically on the quality of engagement rather than moral implications or motivations.
D) quality over quantity
This is the correct answer, as the expert argues that the impact of a blog is determined by the influence of its readers rather than the sheer number of them. The statement underscores the importance of having a meaningful audience that values the content.
Conclusion
The expert's assertion clearly advocates for the principle of quality over quantity by emphasizing the importance of influential readers rather than mere numbers. All other options fail to capture the core message regarding the value of impactful engagement in blogging, making option D the definitive choice.
Answer: A
Animals' mental lives are not as sophisticated as those of humans; nonetheless, what does go on in the minds of animals might surprise many.
This revision effectively combines the two sentences while maintaining the contrast between the sophistication of human and animal mental lives. It uses a semicolon to link the two related ideas, emphasizing the surprising nature of animal cognition despite their lesser sophistication.
A) Animals' mental lives are not as sophisticated as those of humans; nonetheless, what does go on in the minds of animals might surprise many.
This option is correct as it appropriately combines the two original sentences. The use of "nonetheless" highlights the contrast between the lack of sophistication in animals' mental lives and the surprising insights into their cognition, preserving the intended meaning.
B) Animals' mental lives are not as sophisticated as those of humans, so what goes on in animals' minds is not likely to surprise many.
This option is incorrect because it alters the meaning of the original sentences. The use of "so" implies a causal relationship that diminishes the surprising aspect of animal cognition, which contradicts the context where the surprising nature of animal mental activity is emphasized.
C) What does go on in the minds of animals might surprise people who are unaware that animals' mental lives are not as sophisticated as those of humans.
While this option maintains the idea of surprise, it introduces unnecessary complexity by specifying "people who are unaware." This shifts the focus from the general surprise regarding animal cognition to a more limited perspective, which does not align with the original intent.
D) Many people might be surprised by what goes on in the minds of animals because animals' minds are not as sophisticated as those of humans.
This option is incorrect as it implies a reason for surprise that contradicts the original sentences. It suggests that the lack of sophistication directly causes the surprise, which misrepresents the relationship between the ideas presented in the original sentences.
Conclusion
Option A is definitively the best choice as it accurately combines the original sentences while preserving their intended meaning and contrast. The other options either misinterpret the relationship between the ideas or add unnecessary complexity, ultimately failing to convey the essence of the original statements about animal cognition.
Answer: C
Helga changes to a warmer tone to avoid being rude to Margaret.
Helga's shift to a warmer tone indicates her desire to express gratitude to Margaret while also softening her refusal to accept help. This change suggests she is aware of the social dynamics and wants to maintain a pleasant interaction despite her current feelings of discontent.
A) get more information from Margaret about Jim Vayle
This option is incorrect because Helga does not inquire about Jim Vayle in the context of her response. Instead, her focus is on expressing appreciation to Margaret, indicating that her change in tone is not motivated by a desire for information about others.
B) convince Margaret to have breakfast with her
This choice is incorrect as Helga explicitly declines Margaret's offer for breakfast. Her warm tone does not serve to persuade Margaret to join her; rather, it reflects her effort to be polite despite her refusal.
C) avoid being rude to Margaret
This option is correct because Helga's transition to a warmer tone demonstrates her intent to maintain a cordial relationship with Margaret. Although she is not feeling well or engaged, she acknowledges Margaret's concern and expresses gratitude to prevent coming across as dismissive or unkind.
D) stop Margaret from leaving
This choice is incorrect as Helga does not express a desire to keep Margaret from leaving. Instead, she is resolute about her situation and her plans to leave Naxos, indicating that she is not trying to prevent Margaret from departing.
Conclusion
Helga's change to a warmer tone is a strategic social maneuver to avoid rudeness towards Margaret while she declines assistance. All other options fail to capture the essence of her intent, which is rooted in maintaining politeness in a situation where she feels discontent. Thus, option C is the only one that aligns with her actions and motivations in the context of the passage.
Answer: C
Fossil evidence suggested that sauropods existed, on land, for quite a long time.
The best version of the underlined portion is "existed," indicating that the fossil evidence points to their existence in the past, rather than suggesting a future or ongoing existence.
A) (as it is now)
Leaving the sentence as it is with "will have existed" is incorrect because it implies a future perfect tense, which does not align with the context of discussing fossil evidence that reflects past existence.
B) exist,
Using "exist," suggests a present tense that does not accurately represent the findings related to the fossil evidence. The context requires a reference to the past, making this option incorrect.
C) existed,
This option is correct as it appropriately uses the past tense, indicating that the fossil evidence shows sauropods were present on land for an extended period in the past.
D) will exist.
Employing "will exist" indicates a future tense that is inappropriate in this context since the discussion focuses on past evidence derived from fossils, making this option incorrect.
Conclusion
The correct answer "existed" accurately reflects the past nature of the evidence being discussed, while all other options fail to convey the temporal context necessary for understanding the history of sauropods. This highlights the importance of using the correct tense to align with the facts presented in the extract.
Answer: C
Residential development creates a need for communities to extend water, sewer, and other municipal services to previously undeveloped areas; such extension costs more than they collect.
The best version of the underlined portion is "more than they collect," which accurately reflects the comparison between the costs incurred by communities and the revenue they receive from property taxes.
A) as it is now
This option does not improve the original text and lacks clarity. Retaining the phrase "as it is now" fails to specify what comparison is being made regarding costs and collections, leaving the meaning ambiguous.
B) more for communities to collect
This choice introduces unnecessary complexity and does not convey a clear comparison. It suggests a focus on the amount communities need to collect rather than the actual costs versus revenues, which is not the primary concern of the sentence.
C) more than they collect
This option succinctly captures the intended comparison between the costs of extending services and the property tax revenues collected. It clarifies that the expenses outweigh the income, effectively conveying the economic burden on communities.
D) will be more than is collected by communities
While this option captures the essence of the comparison, it introduces an unnecessary future tense ("will be"), which may imply a delay in the costs being realized. The original context appears to discuss current conditions rather than a future projection.
Conclusion
The choice "more than they collect" is the most effective option as it directly compares the costs of extending municipal services to the revenue from property taxes, maintaining clarity and conciseness. All other options either fail to convey the necessary comparison or introduce ambiguity and unnecessary complexity. Thus, option C is definitively the best choice.