ACCUPLACER Next Generation Reading Exams — ACCUPLACER Next Generation Reading Exam

1. Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 2? Vital to a neighborhood, clean water, unspoiled open lands, and diverse species of plants and wildlife are essential for a thriving community.

Answer: D

Explanation:

Clean water, unspoiled open lands, and diverse species of plants and wildlife are essential for a thriving community.

The best version of the underlined portion is "Clean," which succinctly conveys the importance of clean water in the context of community health and environmental sustainability without unnecessary elaboration.

A) (As it is now)

This option retains the original phrasing, which includes "Vital to a neighborhood, clean water," making it longer and less impactful. While it conveys the same message, the additional words detract from the clarity and directness of the statement.

B) Mandatory for residents, clean

This choice introduces the term "mandatory," which implies an obligation rather than the essential nature of clean water. This wording shifts the focus from the inherent value of clean water to a requirement, which may misrepresent the intended message about its importance for the community.

C) Crucially, clean

Although "Crucially" emphasizes the significance of clean water, it adds unnecessary complexity to the sentence. The term does not enhance the message and may distract from the straightforward assertion of clean water's importance.

D) Clean

This option is the most effective because it presents the concept directly and powerfully. By removing extraneous language, it highlights the essential need for clean water, making the statement clearer and more impactful in conveying its importance to the community.

Conclusion

In summary, the choice "Clean" is the most effective because it delivers a concise and powerful message about the necessity of clean water. The other options either complicate the sentence structure or shift the focus away from the core idea, making them less suitable for conveying the importance of clean water in a thriving community.

2. Which choice best conveys a central idea of the passage?

Answer: D

Explanation:

The ability to view the broad spectrum of electromagnetic radiation has revealed the chaos of the universe

The passage emphasizes how advancements in telescope technology have allowed scientists to observe various forms of electromagnetic radiation, leading to the understanding of the chaotic nature of the universe. This exploration has unveiled a myriad of phenomena, including gamma-ray bursts and colliding galaxies, which exemplify the mayhem present in the cosmos.

A) Much of the light in the universe comes from invisible bands of electromagnetic radiation

While this statement highlights the significance of invisible light in the universe, it does not capture the full scope of the passage's focus on the chaos and complexity revealed by observing these bands. The passage is more about the implications of these observations rather than the quantity of light itself.

B) Telescopes have allowed humans to view many types of light, such as infrared and ultraviolet

This choice accurately reflects one aspect of the passage regarding the types of light made visible through advancements in technology. However, it lacks the depth of the central idea, which centers on the chaotic revelations about the universe rather than merely the types of light observed.

C) Some planets and stars provide more invisible light than visible light, which causes major disturbances

This option incorrectly focuses on specific celestial bodies and their light output rather than the broader implications of the technological advancements discussed in the passage. While it mentions disturbances, it does not encapsulate the overall chaos of the universe that the correct answer addresses.

D) The ability to view the broad spectrum of electromagnetic radiation has revealed the chaos of the universe

This choice directly aligns with the core message of the passage, which illustrates how the capacity to observe various forms of light has led to discoveries of tumultuous cosmic events. It encapsulates both the advancements in technology and the resulting understanding of the universe's chaotic nature.

Conclusion

Answer D is the most comprehensive choice, as it encompasses both the technological advancements that allow for the observation of the electromagnetic spectrum and the resulting insights into the universe's chaotic behavior. The other options either miss the broader implications, focus too narrowly, or misinterpret the relationship between light and cosmic phenomena, making them less suitable in conveying the central idea of the passage.

3. Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 10? The same ravens seemed unconcerned about protecting their hidden food when other ravens were nearby, but, stuck behind an obstacle that would have obscured their view.

Answer: D

Explanation:

Food when other ravens were nearby but

The best version of the underlined portion maintains clarity and simplicity, allowing the sentence to flow logically. The phrase "food when other ravens were nearby but" effectively conveys the idea without unnecessary punctuation that could disrupt the reading experience.

A) (as it is now)

This option retains the original structure, which includes a comma before "but." However, this comma is unnecessary and creates a pause that disrupts the flow of the sentence. Therefore, it is not the best choice.

B) food—when other ravens were nearby—but

This version uses dashes to set off the clause, which can create confusion and an overly dramatic pause in the sentence. The use of dashes is not suitable in this context, as it detracts from the straightforward connection between the ideas presented.

C) food: when other ravens were nearby, but

The use of a colon in this option suggests that a list or an explanation follows, which is not the case here. This punctuation choice leads to a misunderstanding of the sentence's intent and is thus not appropriate.

D) food when other ravens were nearby but

This option correctly eliminates unnecessary punctuation, allowing the sentence to read smoothly and clearly. It maintains the intended meaning without interruption, making it the best choice for clarity and coherence.

Conclusion

Option D is the most effective choice because it presents the ideas in a clear and straightforward manner without the distractions of unnecessary punctuation. Options A, B, and C all introduce elements that hinder readability or misrepresent the relationship between the clauses, making them less suitable than the concise structure of Option D.

4. Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 13: 'It might result in fewer trips to the store, which could keep fuel and cut down on pollution'?

Answer: C

Explanation:

Conserve is the best choice for the underlined portion of the sentence.

Using "conserve" in the sentence accurately conveys the idea of using resources more efficiently, which aligns with the context of reducing trips to the store and minimizing fuel consumption.

A) (as it is now)

Keeping the original phrasing does not effectively communicate the intended meaning. The phrase "keep fuel" is vague and does not clearly indicate the reduction or efficient use of fuel, making it less precise in the context of environmental conservation.

B) protect

The word "protect" implies safeguarding or defending something, which does not align with the context of reducing fuel use. This choice fails to convey the intended message of using resources more efficiently, making it an unsuitable option.

C) conserve

"Conserve" is the most appropriate choice as it directly relates to the efficient use of fuel, emphasizing the reduction of unnecessary trips to the store. This aligns perfectly with the passage's focus on energy savings through decreased food waste and improved shopping habits.

D) support

Using "support" suggests an endorsement or assistance, which does not fit the context of reducing fuel consumption. This choice fails to address the goal of minimizing resource use and is therefore not suitable.

Conclusion

The word "conserve" effectively captures the essence of minimizing resource usage in the context of the sentence. While options A, B, and D do not accurately reflect the intended meaning, "conserve" emphasizes the importance of efficient resource management, making it the best choice for the underlined portion.

5. The passage is an example of which rhetorical strategy?

Answer: D

Explanation:

The passage is an example of a Definition–example rhetorical strategy.

The extract illustrates a definition of a 'symbiotic relationship' followed by a specific example involving the Nile crocodile and the Egyptian plover to clarify the concept. This approach effectively demonstrates the meaning of the term through practical illustration.

A) Claim–evidence

This option is incorrect because the extract does not present a claim supported by evidence. Instead, it defines a concept and provides an example, rather than arguing a point or asserting a claim that requires substantiation.

B) Compare–contrast

The compare-contrast strategy is not utilized in the passage, as there is no juxtaposition of two or more entities to highlight their differences or similarities. The focus is solely on defining a relationship through a specific example, rather than comparing multiple concepts.

C) Quotation–analysis

This option is also incorrect since the passage does not include any quotations or analysis of quoted material. The extract centers on defining a term and providing a corresponding example, lacking any direct citations or critical examination of external statements.

D) Definition–example

This is the correct choice as the passage clearly defines a 'symbiotic relationship' and follows it with a concrete example involving the Nile crocodile and the Egyptian plover. This method effectively illustrates the definition, making it accessible and understandable.

Conclusion

The passage exemplifies the Definition–example rhetorical strategy by clearly stating the meaning of 'symbiotic relationship' and supporting it with a specific instance. Other options fail to represent the structure of the passage, as they either misinterpret the purpose or do not apply to the content presented. This clarity in definition and illustration is essential in educational contexts for facilitating comprehension.

6. Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 2? Its first bike lane - and the country's first - was built...

Answer: D

Explanation:

Its first bike lane - and the country's first - was built...

The best version of the underlined portion is "first-," which uses a hyphen to connect the two clauses effectively. This punctuation indicates that the phrase "and the country's first" is an additional descriptive element of the subject.

A) (as it is now) first,

This option incorrectly uses a comma after "first," which disrupts the flow of the sentence and fails to properly connect the two related thoughts. The phrase "and the country's first" needs to be connected to "first" rather than separated by a comma.

B) first

Using "first" alone lacks the necessary context. It does not include the additional information provided by "and the country's first," resulting in an incomplete thought that diminishes the clarity of the statement.

C) first:

This option incorrectly uses a colon, which is typically used to introduce a list or an explanation. The colon does not fit in this context, as the phrase following "first" is not a list or elaboration but rather an additional descriptor.

D) first-

This option correctly uses a hyphen to connect "first" with the additional phrase "and the country's first." The hyphen signals that the second part is directly related to the first, maintaining the sentence's coherence and flow.

Conclusion

Option D is the definitive correct answer, as it effectively connects the two related parts of the sentence while preserving clarity. All other options fail to maintain the sentence structure, either by introducing unnecessary punctuation or omitting essential context. Thus, "first-" is the best choice for conveying the intended meaning clearly and accurately.

7. Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 6 (reproduced below)? More recent discoveries of sauropod fossils in locations around the world have confirmed that these resilient animals, did indeed walk the earth for millions of years.

Answer: D

Explanation:

More recent discoveries of sauropod fossils in locations around the world have confirmed that these resilient animals did indeed walk the Earth for millions of years.

The best version of the underlined portion is "that these resilient animals," as it correctly maintains the flow of the sentence without unnecessary punctuation.

A) (as it is now)

This option includes a comma before "did indeed," which creates an unnecessary pause in the sentence. The placement of the comma disrupts the intended clarity and flow of the statement, making it less grammatically correct.

B) that, these resilient animals

This option incorrectly adds a comma after "that," which is not appropriate in this context. It disrupts the grammatical structure of the sentence and creates confusion, leading to a misinterpretation of the relationship between the clauses.

C) that these resilient animals.

While this option removes the comma, it incorrectly ends the phrase with a period. This punctuation error suggests the end of a complete statement, which would fragment the sentence and fail to convey the intended meaning.

D) that these resilient animals

This option is the most appropriate as it maintains the sentence's integrity and flow. It avoids unnecessary punctuation, creating a clear and concise statement that effectively communicates the idea.

Conclusion

Option D is definitively the correct choice because it preserves the grammatical structure and clarity of the sentence. All other options either introduce unnecessary punctuation or disrupt the flow, ultimately leading to confusion in the sentence's meaning.

8. According to the author of Passage 2, fierce animal species inspire what feeling in humans?

Answer: B

Explanation:

Fierce animal species inspire humility in humans.

The passage indicates that the existence of fierce animal species serves to remind humans of their place within the natural world, fostering a sense of humility. This awareness of potentially being prey rather than dominant beings is a key theme presented by the author.

A) Humor

While humor can arise in various situations involving animals, the passage does not suggest that fierce animal species inspire humor in humans. Instead, it focuses on the serious implications of these species' existence and their impact on human self-perception.

B) Humility

This option is correct as the author explicitly states that fierce animal species evoke a sense of humility in humans. The text emphasizes the importance of recognizing our role as part of the natural world and the sobering reality of being prey, which cultivates humility.

C) Bravery

Although encounters with fierce animals may require bravery, the passage does not indicate that these species inspire feelings of bravery in humans. Instead, it highlights the awareness and humility that come from recognizing our vulnerability in the natural order.

D) Arrogance

This option is incorrect because the passage argues against feelings of arrogance. Instead of promoting a sense of superiority, fierce animal species remind humans of their humility and the dangers present in the world, counteracting any notion of arrogance.

Conclusion

The correct answer, humility, is firmly supported by the passage's exploration of the relationship between humans and fierce animal species. All other options fail to capture the essence of the message conveyed, which is about recognizing our place within the natural hierarchy rather than feeling superior or brave.

9. In context, which of the following words or phrases would most appropriately be inserted immediately before "in my own home kitchen" in sentence 7 (reproduced below)? It's only when I'm in my own home kitchen that I can relax and take real pleasure in the culinary arts.

Answer: D

Explanation:

By myself is the most appropriate phrase to convey solitude in the home kitchen.

The phrase "by myself" emphasizes the chef's preference for solitude while cooking at home, which aligns with the sentiment expressed in the extract about enjoying cooking without the distractions of a busy restaurant environment.

A) here

The word "here" does not effectively convey the sense of solitude that the chef is seeking in their home kitchen. It suggests a physical location rather than the emotional state of being alone, which is crucial to the context of the sentence.

B) helping out

The phrase "helping out" indicates collaboration and involvement with others, which contradicts the chef's desire for solitude while cooking. This option would change the meaning of the sentence, making it unsuitable for the intended context.

C) surrounded by family

While "surrounded by family" conveys a sense of togetherness and warmth, it directly opposes the chef's need for personal space in the kitchen. This option does not align with the chef's assertion that they can only relax when cooking alone.

D) by myself

The phrase "by myself" perfectly encapsulates the chef's desire for solitude while cooking at home. It reinforces the idea that the chef finds joy and relaxation in cooking without the pressures of a bustling kitchen and the presence of others.

Conclusion

The correct choice, "by myself," effectively captures the essence of the chef's experience in their home kitchen, highlighting the importance of solitude in their culinary enjoyment. All other options fail to reflect the core sentiment of the extract, as they either suggest social interaction or do not convey the necessary sense of being alone, which is fundamental to the chef's enjoyment of cooking.

10. Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 12 (reproduced below)? Mason's new study is one of many that are changing how scientists think about empathy and altruism, namely: that such characteristics are not limited to people, as they once thought.

Answer: C

Explanation:

Mason's new study is one of many that are changing how scientists think about empathy and altruism, namely, that such characteristics are not limited to people, as they once thought.

The best version of the underlined portion is "altruism, namely," which correctly uses a comma to introduce the explanatory phrase that follows. This punctuation clarifies the relationship between the two ideas.

A) (as it is now)

This option retains the original punctuation, which incorrectly uses a colon. A colon should be used to introduce a list or an explanation that follows directly, but in this context, a comma is more appropriate to connect the clauses smoothly.

B) altruism: namely

This option incorrectly uses a colon instead of a comma. A colon is inappropriate here because the phrase following "namely" continues the sentence rather than presenting a separate list or explanation, making this choice grammatically incorrect.

C) altruism, namely,

This choice is correct as it uses a comma to effectively introduce the clarification about the characteristics of empathy and altruism. The commas provide the necessary pauses that enhance the readability and clarity of the sentence.

D) altruism-namely,

The use of a hyphen in this option is incorrect. A hyphen does not serve the purpose of connecting clauses in this context and disrupts the flow of the sentence, making the phrasing awkward and unclear.

Conclusion

The correct option, "altruism, namely," appropriately employs punctuation to create a clear and effective sentence structure. The other options either misuse punctuation or fail to maintain the clarity necessary for the sentence's meaning, reinforcing the importance of proper grammatical choices in academic writing.