Question 5

The passage is an example of a Definition–example rhetorical strategy.

The extract illustrates a definition of a 'symbiotic relationship' followed by a specific example involving the Nile crocodile and the Egyptian plover to clarify the concept. This approach effectively demonstrates the meaning of the term through practical illustration.

A) Claim–evidence

This option is incorrect because the extract does not present a claim supported by evidence. Instead, it defines a concept and provides an example, rather than arguing a point or asserting a claim that requires substantiation.

B) Compare–contrast

The compare-contrast strategy is not utilized in the passage, as there is no juxtaposition of two or more entities to highlight their differences or similarities. The focus is solely on defining a relationship through a specific example, rather than comparing multiple concepts.

C) Quotation–analysis

This option is also incorrect since the passage does not include any quotations or analysis of quoted material. The extract centers on defining a term and providing a corresponding example, lacking any direct citations or critical examination of external statements.

D) Definition–example

This is the correct choice as the passage clearly defines a 'symbiotic relationship' and follows it with a concrete example involving the Nile crocodile and the Egyptian plover. This method effectively illustrates the definition, making it accessible and understandable.

Conclusion

The passage exemplifies the Definition–example rhetorical strategy by clearly stating the meaning of 'symbiotic relationship' and supporting it with a specific instance. Other options fail to represent the structure of the passage, as they either misinterpret the purpose or do not apply to the content presented. This clarity in definition and illustration is essential in educational contexts for facilitating comprehension.