Question 15

The author of Passage 2 refers to 'biomedical scientists' in order to draw a parallel.

By mentioning biomedical scientists, the author draws a parallel between them and environmental scientists, highlighting how both fields can engage in advocacy without losing credibility. This comparison emphasizes that advocating for the public good is a common practice among scientists.

A) discuss a finding

This option is incorrect because the author does not present any specific findings related to biomedical scientists. Instead, the reference serves a comparative purpose rather than discussing empirical data or results.

B) cite an exception

While biomedical scientists are mentioned, they are not presented as an exception to any rule or situation. The author uses them to illustrate a point about advocacy, making this option inaccurate.

C) draw a parallel

This option is correct as the author uses the example of biomedical scientists to draw a parallel with environmental scientists. Both groups are engaged in advocacy to inform the public about important issues, which serves to strengthen the argument made in Passage 2.

D) acknowledge a counterargument

The author does not acknowledge a counterargument regarding biomedical scientists; rather, they use the example to bolster their point about the role of advocacy in science. Thus, this option does not accurately reflect the purpose of the reference.

Conclusion

The correct answer, C, effectively captures the author's intent to connect the roles of biomedical scientists with environmental scientists in terms of advocacy. All other options fail to represent the comparative nature of the reference, either misidentifying it as an exception or a counterargument instead of a parallel relationship.