20. The author of Passage 2 would likely respond to the actions attributed to 'academia' in the fifth sentence of Passage 1 ('academia...complaints') by asserting that:
Answer: C
Colleges should treat plagiarism as a serious offense.
The author of Passage 2 would likely assert that universities increasingly treat plagiarism as a serious offense, as indicated by the strengthened copyright laws and the severe repercussions faced by individuals caught committing plagiarism in academia.
A) these actions are consistent with the approach common in publishing
This option is incorrect because the author of Passage 2 emphasizes the seriousness of plagiarism and the ethical responsibility of academic institutions. While there may be parallels with publishing, the focus of the passage is on how academia must address plagiarism more rigorously, not on consistency with publishing practices.
B) academic plagiarism has usually been misrepresented in surveys
This choice is also incorrect. The passage does not comment on the validity or misrepresentation of survey data regarding plagiarism. Instead, it highlights the need for a serious response to plagiarism rather than questioning the data collection methods.
C) universities increasingly treat plagiarism as a serious offense
This option is correct. Passage 2 discusses how plagiarism has evolved to be treated with greater severity, akin to a felony, and underscores the importance of intellectual property rights. This aligns with the notion that universities should uphold strong standards against plagiarism.
D) colleges should provide amnesty to researchers accused of plagiarism
This statement is incorrect as it contradicts the author's perspective in Passage 2. Rather than suggesting leniency or amnesty, the author advocates for strict consequences for plagiarism, highlighting the seriousness with which such offenses should be treated.
Conclusion
The correct answer, C, reflects the author's position that universities are becoming more stringent in their handling of plagiarism, consistent with the ethical imperative to protect intellectual property. The other options either misinterpret the author's message or diverge from the core issue of reinforcing academic integrity.