Question 11

Sentence 6 should be deleted from the passage because it contains irrelevant information.

Sentence 6 discusses the natural hot springs in Saratoga Springs, which is unrelated to the invention or history of potato chips.

A) Sentence 3

Sentence 3 provides critical context for the creation of potato chips, explaining the customer's complaint about the thickness of the French-fried potatoes. This sentence is essential to the narrative of how the potato chip was invented and should not be deleted.

B) Sentence 6

Sentence 6 focuses on the hot springs in Saratoga Springs, which does not contribute to the story of potato chips. While it describes the location, it distracts from the main topic and therefore is the best candidate for deletion.

C) Sentence 7

Sentence 7 highlights the popularity of potato chips, referring to their original names and indicating their rise in fame. This information is relevant to the overall narrative and underscores the significance of potato chips in culinary history.

D) Sentence 12

Sentence 12 addresses skepticism regarding George Crum's role as the inventor of potato chips, presenting alternative historical perspectives. This sentence adds depth to the discussion and is relevant to the topic, making it inappropriate for deletion.

Conclusion

Sentence 6 is extraneous as it diverts attention from the primary focus of the passage— the invention and history of the potato chip. In contrast, sentences 3, 7, and 12 all provide relevant context or insight related to the potato chips, reinforcing their importance in the narrative. Thus, removing sentence 6 effectively streamlines the passage while maintaining its core message.