9. Why was Lorca’s decision to go to New York instead of Paris considered unusual?

Answer: A

Explanation:

Lorca’s decision to go to New York instead of Paris was considered unusual because most young writers and painters of his era dreamed of Paris.

Federico Lorca's choice to sail to New York was unconventional for his time as most young artists aspired to the cultural hub of Paris, which was the center of artistic innovation and inspiration.

A) Because most young writers and painters of his era dreamed of Paris

This option accurately reflects the context provided in the extract, where it is noted that during the late 1920s, many young writers and painters were idealizing life in Paris. Lorca's choice to break from this trend and seek inspiration in New York sets him apart and emphasizes the uniqueness of his artistic journey.

B) Because Paris was too dangerous to visit at the time

This choice is incorrect as the extract does not mention any dangers associated with Paris during Lorca's time. The decision was rooted in cultural aspirations rather than safety concerns, making this option unfounded.

C) Because Spanish artists were legally barred from Paris

There is no mention in the extract of any legal restrictions preventing Spanish artists from visiting Paris. This option is incorrect and does not align with the historical context of artists traveling freely between these cultural centers.

D) Because New York was much cheaper than Paris

While economic factors might affect travel decisions, the extract does not support this notion. The emphasis is on Lorca's desire to explore a different artistic vision rather than financial considerations, rendering this option incorrect.

Conclusion

Lorca's decision to go to New York instead of Paris is rooted in the cultural aspirations of his time, where most young artists were drawn to Paris. This choice highlights his unique perspective and willingness to diverge from conventional paths, making option A the only correct response, while the other options either lack supporting evidence or misinterpret the context.