Question 17

Supporters claim successful continuation of conservancies will benefit future generations, attracting more and more tourists from around the globe.

Replacing "They say" with "Supporters claim" provides a more precise attribution of the statement, indicating that this perspective is held by advocates of the conservancies rather than an ambiguous source.

A) Replace "will" with "is likely to"

This change would alter the certainty of the statement, making it less definitive. The original wording, "will," implies a stronger belief in the outcome, while "is likely to" introduces uncertainty that may not align with the intended message about the benefits of conservancies.

B) Replace "attracting" with "to attract"

Changing "attracting" to "to attract" modifies the grammatical structure and could disrupt the flow of the sentence. The gerund form "attracting" effectively conveys an ongoing action that complements the main clause, whereas "to attract" would require a restructuring of the sentence.

C) Replace "They say" with "Supporters claim"

This option is the most effective as it provides clarity about who is making the assertion. "Supporters claim" specifies that the statement reflects the views of those who advocate for the conservancies, enhancing the credibility of the information.

D) Delete "more and more"

Removing "more and more" would diminish the emphasis on the potential growth of tourism. The phrase highlights the expected increase in tourists, which is a key aspect of the benefits associated with the successful continuation of conservancies.

Conclusion

Using "Supporters claim" strengthens the statement by clearly identifying the source of the assertion, making it more credible and direct. The other options either weaken the certainty of the prediction, disrupt the flow of the sentence, or lessen the emphasis on the growth of tourism. Therefore, option C is the best choice to enhance the clarity and impact of the sentence.